OBJECTIVE: To further refine the wording of screening questions and examine their face validity through cognitive interviews with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and chronic mechanical back pain patients. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured cognitive interviews were conducted with 30 patients (10 axSpA; 20 chronic mechanical back pain patients) to assess the face validity and comprehensibility of the screening questions. The interview protocol focused on 12 questions/domains including participants' feedback/thoughts on the duration of suffering from back pain, age at onset of back pain, pace of back pain development, improvement of pain with movement or rest, nocturnal back pain improving upon awakening, pain in other parts of the body, responsiveness of pain to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, history of autoimmune conditions, and domains such as sleep, sitting, and stiffness. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level and Flesch reading ease scores were then analyzed for the revised versions of screening questions. RESULTS: Participants preferred questions that allowed them to provide more details regarding the frequency of their symptoms. Questions were refined for clarity and eliminated if participants considered them to be irrelevant (e.g., NSAIDs). Two sample screeners were derived from twelve questions each with an overall reading grade of 7.5 and reading ease of 65.7%. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to design a screening tool that is accessible to most (e.g., reading level) and clear to individuals with back pain. An evidence-based approach to demonstrate the validity of the screening tool will be critical for it to be implemented widely into clinical practice. Key Points * Our study developed two sample screeners that are clear to individuals with back pain and accessible to most with an overall Flesch-Kincaid reading grade of 7.5 and Flesch reading ease of 65.7%. * Questions that were considered irrelevant to participants were eliminated such as responsiveness of pain to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). * It is feasible to design a screening tool that is accessible to most (e.g., reading level) and clear to individuals with back pain.

INTRODUCTION: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) affects patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Prior studies have documented gender differences in axSpA across the disease spectrum. Our study aims to assess gender differences on the effects of axSpA on patients' HRQoL. METHOD: A secondary qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using data from in-depth interviews (n = 24) of patients with a rheumatologist-confirmed axSpA diagnosis. This analysis focused on gender and HRQoL themes including activity, occupation, sleep, healthcare system, mental health, medication usage, and relationships. RESULTS: While men on average waited a year longer than women to tell healthcare providers about symptoms (2.5 years men versus 1.6 years women), the interval between first report of symptoms to diagnosis was ~ 2 years longer for women relative to men (7.5 women versus 9.3 years men). Women and men with axSpA shared more similarities than differences regarding the impact of disease on HRQoL including (1) physical health, (2) limited mobility, (3) occupation, (4) sleep, (5) healthcare system obstacles, (6) mental health, (7) medication usage, and (8) relationships. Some women reported being dismissed by doctors due to their gender, and some described the pain experienced during pregnancy and complications during birth. CONCLUSIONS: axSpA adversely impacts HRQoL regardless of gender, but women seeking care for axSpA may experience greater challenges reaching a diagnosis. It is essential that providers recognize impaired HRQoL among men and women with axSpA. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to identify aspects of HRQoL to adequately address people with axSpA. Key Points * While men waited on average a year longer to tell their healthcare provider about their symptoms, the diagnostic delay is 2 years longer for women. * Women and men with axSpA have similar experiences regarding impacts on their health-related quality of life. * Some women describe difficulty during pregnancy and being dismissed by doctors due to their gender.