Browsing by keyword "Work Group on Substance Abuse Disorders"
Now showing items 1-4 of 4
-
Dysphagia in psychiatric patients: clinical and videofluoroscopic studyDeaths due to airway obstruction are more common in psychiatric inpatients than in the normal population. A dysphagia program was started in a 400 bed Massachusetts psychiatric hospital after 4 patients in 1 year died from asphyxia. In the year after the program was started, there were no deaths; however, 28 patients experienced 32 choking incidents. The 28 patients received clinical evaluations by speech pathologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and internists. Of the incidents, 55% required use of the Heimlich maneuver to open the airway. Choking incidents could be classified into five types based on results of clinical examination: bradykinetic, dyskinetic, fast eating syndrome, paralytic, and medical. Twenty-one of the 28 patients were studied by videofluoroscopy and 86% of the videos were abnormal, showing aspiration in eight, webs in five, and delay in the oral phase in five. Patients with bradykinetic dysphagia (secondary to neuroleptic-induced extra-pyramidal syndrome [EPS]) and paralytic dysphagia appeared to experience a more severe form of choking.
-
Is the use of a bougie necessary for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplicationHYPOTHESIS: Esophageal intubation with a bougie during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is commonly used to prevent an excessively tight wrap. However, a bougie may cause intraoperative gastric and esophageal perforations. We hypothesized that LNF is safe and effective when performed without a bougie. DESIGN: Retrospective review of 102 consecutive patients who underwent LNF without a bougie. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: All patients presented with symptoms of reflux disease. Mean (+/- SD) percentage of time with pH of less than 4 was 12.6% +/- 9.4%. Mean DeMeester score was 47.8. Mean (+/- SD) resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 15.0 +/- 9.4 mm Hg. Mean (+/- SD) distal esophageal amplitude was 69.4 +/- 39.2 mm Hg. INTERVENTION: During LNF, we obtained 2 to 3 cm of intra-abdominal esophagus, divided all short gastric vessels, reapproximated the crura, and performed a loose 360 degrees fundoplication without a bougie. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative rates of dysphagia, gas bloat, and recurrent reflux. RESULTS: In the early postoperative period, 50 patients (49.0%) complained of mild, 11 (10.8%) of moderate, and 7 (6.9%) of severe dysphagia. Average (+/- SD) duration of early dysphagia was 4.6 +/- 2.1 weeks. Dysphagia resolved in 61 (89.7%) of 68 patients within 6 weeks. Late resolution of dysphagia was noted in 4 (5.8%) patients. Three patients were successfully treated with esophageal dilatations. Persistent dysphagia was found in 1 patient. Thirty patients (29.4%) had transient gas bloat. Mild persistent reflux, requiring daily medication, was noted in 5 (4.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of LNF without a bougie offers a safe and effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. While avoiding the potential risks for gastric and esophageal injury, it may provide low rates of long-term postoperative dysphagia and reflux recurrence.
-
Privilege and discharge decisions for psychiatric inpatients with dysphagiaPsychiatric patients have an increased risk for choking compared with the general population because of risk factors such as medication side effects and food gorging. A state hospital program for managing patients with dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing, includes interventions such as modified diets, mealtime monitoring, and adjusting psychotropic medications. Clinicians may find it difficult to make decisions about privileges and placement for dysphagic patients who do not comply with dietary modifications in unsupervised settings. For many such patients, close supervision and even placement on a locked ward may seem necessary. The authors recommend a risk-benefit approach: clinicians must balance the safety afforded by restrictions against the benefits of increased privileges or placement in a less restrictive setting. Quality of life and patients' preferences must also be considered.