Browsing by UMass Chan Affiliation "Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery"
Now showing items 1-2 of 2
-
Gender-specific Anatomical Distribution of Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator: A Radiographic Study for Perineal ReconstructionBackground: Cancer, trauma, infection, or radiation can cause perineal defects. Fasciocutaneous flaps based on perforator vessels (PV) from the internal pudendal artery (IPA) provide an ideal reconstructive option for moderate defects. We hypothesized that, due to gender differences in the pelvic-perineal region, the anatomical distribution of PV differs between genders. Methods: Computed tomography angiographies from male and female patients without pelvic-perineal pathologies were retrospectively analyzed to study the vascular anatomy of the IPA. The number, size, type, and distribution of PV were recorded and compared between genders. Four anatomical regions were defined to describe the distribution of PV on each perineal side: anterior (A), anterior-central (AC), central-posterior (CP), and posterior (P). Results: A total of 63 computed tomography angiographies were analyzed (men, 31; women, 32). Each IPA provides 2 +/- 1 PV and 5 +/- 2 terminal (cutaneous) branches: in both genders, 85% of PV are septocutaneous (15% musculocutaneous). In women, 70.5% of PV are located in AC, 28.2% in CP, 1.2% in A, and 0% in P: average diameter of the PV is 2.4 +/- 0.3 mm. In men, 53.7% of PV are located in CP, 43.1% in AC, 3.3% in A, and 0% in P: average diameter of the PV is 2.8 +/- 0.5 mm. Gender-specific differences in anatomical distribution of PV are significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Number, size, and type of terminal branches of PV of the IPA are consistent between genders, but their distribution is different, with women having an anterior predominance. Knowledge of gender-specific anatomy can guide preoperative planning and intraoperative dissection in flap-based perineal reconstruction.
-
Rethinking Farkas: Updating Cephalic Index Norms in a Large, Diverse PopulationBACKGROUND: Cephalic index, the ratio of head width to length, is one normative indicator used by insurers to derive criteria for plagiocephaly helmet authorization. Current norms were established by a small sample of white children in the 1987 Farkas and Munro data set. This study establishes updated cephalic index values for infants and children in a large, diverse patient population. METHODS: Children aged 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, 9 to 12 months, 2 to 3 years, and 12 to 14 years were recruited at their well-child appointment. Cephalic index was calculated for each age group and compared to previously established norms. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy patients met inclusion criteria. The means for boys and girls between 0 and 6 months were 83.5 (n = 155, SD 6.01) and 83.5 (n = 191, SD 5.80), respectively. Established means for boys and girls between 0 and 6 months were 74.4 (n = 38, SD 5.2) and 74.3 (n = 49, SD 6.1), respectively. The difference between norms is highly statistically significant (p < 0.0001). For this age range, insurance criteria for a helmet is > 83.7 for boys and > 82.7 for girls. Using previous norms, 74 boys (44.6 percent) and 104 girls (54.5 percent) would meet criteria for a helmet under current guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The mean cephalic index of children has changed. The reasons could include diversifying populations in the United States and the introduction of the Back to Sleep campaign. Over 50 percent of children may inappropriately meet criteria for a helmet based on prior norms. Updating norms could change the definition of plagiocephaly for a helmet orthosis.
