Browsing by keyword "Enema"
Now showing items 1-4 of 4
-
Barium enemas in the frail elderly.PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation was to determine the frequency of and predictors for inadequate barium enemas in the frail elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical and radiologic records of 171 elderly institutionalized patients (mean age = 85.3 years), who underwent barium enema examinations, were retrospectively reviewed. The study outcome of primary interest was the radiologist's report of the adequacy of examination as indicated in the written summary of the results of the barium enema procedure. RESULTS: Eighty-eight (51.5%) of the 171 studies were deemed inadequate, with poor bowel preparation a primary or contributing factor in 89.7% of the inadequate studies. Among a variety of demographic and clinical factors, only long-term laxative and/or cathartic use was associated with an inadequate study (odds ratio = 7.0; 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 18.0). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a very high frequency of inadequate barium enema examinations in the very old and suggest a need for improved methods of bowel preparation in this patient population, especially in those who are long-term users of laxatives and cathartics.
-
Colorectal cancer screening in Massachusetts: measuring compliance with current guidelinesCONTEXT: Professional organizations have published guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. Defining which patients are currently, or should be, screened is an important clinical and public health issue. OBJECTIVE: To document the prevalence of colorectal cancer screening and profile the tests patients have had. DESIGN/POPULATION: A random-digit telephone survey of Massachusetts adults, 50 years of age and older. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of persons ever and currently tested by fecal occult blood tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, barium enema, colonoscopy, or some combination of these tests. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of those contacted agreed to the telephone interview. Approximately 29% of the 1119 respondents had never had any currently accepted test, including 10% who reported having only a fecal occult blood test done in a provider's office and 19% who reported having no tests. At least 51% were currently tested by one or more tests for screening, diagnosis, or both. Another 10% were possibly current by colonoscopy or barium enema, both of which can be ordered for screening but are more commonly used to evaluate a problem, such as rectal bleeding, or for surveillance after identification of a polyp or other abnormality. An additional 11% had been tested at some point but were not current according to guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate assessment of rates of colorectal cancer screening is complex because of the multiple acceptable screening methods, the fact that patients may be tested for screening or diagnostic purposes, and the lack of adequate systems for tracking such testing. For accurate measurement, all methods must be assessed regardless of whether tests were ordered for screening, diagnosis, or surveillance.
-
Constipation-related symptoms and bowel program concerning individuals with spinal cord injury.PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of constipation-related symptoms in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), to describe the bowel program as reported by patients and including use of bowel medications and evacuation techniques, and to examine the clinical, functional and pharmacological risks of difficulty with evacuation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of all in-patients at least 3 months beyond acute injury, on the West Roxbury/Brockton VAMC SCI Service, during a 10 month period (n = 197). Clinical, functional, and medication data were abstracted from medical and nursing records. Individual interviews were conducted with all available participants (n = 161, 82%) regarding bowel-related symptoms and treatment over the previous 1 month period. The study definition of difficulty with evacuation was spending more than 1 h per episode of bowel evacuation. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the 161 interview responders spent more than 1 h on bowel evacuation, 50% reported abdominal distension and 38% reported abdominal pain, 27% reported headaches or sweats relieved by having a bowel movement, and 33% reported fecal incontinence at least once a month. The bisacodyl suppository was the most commonly used laxative agent, while docusate was the most popular oral agent. Subjects with difficulty with evacuation (n = 66) were compared with those who spent less than 1 h on evacuation (n = 95). Factors associated with difficulty with evacuation were tetraplegia, Frankel grade A/B, laxative use, polypharmacy, previous urinary outlet surgery, and symptoms of abdominal pain and distension. CONCLUSION: Constipation-related symptoms are highly prevalent in individuals with spinal cord injury, despite considerable laxative use. Our findings suggest that difficulty with evacuation can be predicted on the basis of a patient's clinical profile.
-
Constipation: assessment and management in an institutionalized elderly population.OBJECTIVES: To examine prescribing and utilization patterns of laxatives, stool softeners, and enemas in a large, long-term care facility, to compare self-reports of constipation with specific, bowel-related symptoms in residents of this facility, and to examine concordance between bowel symptoms reported by residents and the assessments of the nursing staff. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: All individuals residing in an academically oriented long-term care facility in the United States for at least 1 month (n = 694). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical, functional, and medication data were abstracted from the medical and nursing records. Individual interviews regarding bowel-related symptoms were conducted with all able participants (n = 456 (66%)) and their respective primary nurses, and concordance was determined. The study definition of symptom-specific constipation was no more than 2 bowel movements per week and/or straining on more than 1 in 4 bowel movements. RESULTS: Fifty percent (n = 367) of all residents used at least 1 daily laxative, stool softener or enema during a 1-month study period. Over half of all laxative users (n = 200) took more than 60 doses per month. Stool softeners were most commonly prescribed, followed by saline laxatives, stimulant laxatives, hyperosmolar laxatives, and bulk laxatives. Forty-seven percent (n = 213) of the 456 interview responders reported constipation ("self-reporters"), but only 62% of self-reporters met the study criteria for symptom-specific constipation. Concordance between resident's and nurse's report regarding specific bowel symptoms was only fair to slight (kappa 0.12-0.38). Self-reporters of constipation took almost twice as many laxatives, stool softeners, and enemas as residents who did not report constipation.