• Bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with Surfaxin (KL(4)-surfactant) for acute respiratory distress syndrome

      Wiswell, Thomas E.; Smith, Robert M.; Katz, Laurence B.; Mastroianni, Lisa; Wong, Davies Y.; Willms, David; Heard, Stephen O.; Wilson, Mark M.; Hite, R. Duncan; Anzueto, Antonio; et al. (1999-10-01)
      We performed a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of sequential bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with a dilute synthetic surfactant (Surfaxin) in 12 adults with ARDS. Patients received one of three dosing regimens in which aliquots of Surfaxin were administered via a wedged bronchoscope to each of the 19 bronchopulmonary segments. Suctioning was performed 10-30 s after instillation of individual aliquots. Group 1 patients (n = 3) received one 30-ml aliquot of a 2.5-mg/ml concentration of Surfaxin in each segment, followed by a second 30-ml aliquot with a 10-mg/ml concentration. Group 2 patients (n = 4) received two 30-ml aliquots of the 2.5-mg/ml concentration followed by a third lavage with the 10-mg/ml concentration. Group 3 patients (n = 5) received therapy identical to that received by patients in Group 2 and were eligible for repeat dosing 6 to 24 h later. All patients tolerated the procedure. There were no serious adverse experiences ascribed to either the procedure or the surfactant. In the 96 h after treatment initiation, FI(O(2)) decreased from 0.80 to 0.52 and PEEP decreased from 10.3 to 7.6 cm H(2)O. Bronchoscopic "cleansing" of the lungs with dilute Surfaxin may offer a safe and feasible approach to improving outcomes in patients with ARDS. Wiswell TE, Smith RM, Katz LB, Mastroianni L, Wong DY, Willms D, Heard S, Wilson M, Hite RD, Anzueto A, Revak SD, Cochrane CG. Bronchopulmonary segmental lavage with Surfaxin (KL(4)-surfactant) for acute respiratory distress syndrome.
    • Factors correlated with NPPV use in ALS

      Jackson, Carlayne E.; Lovitt, Steven; Gowda, Neelam; Anderson, Frederick A. Jr.; Miller, Robert G. (2006-06-07)
      In spite of emerging evidence of therapeutic benefit from non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), only a minority of ALS patients use this therapy. We examined factors which correlate with use of NPPV in ALS patients. Data were analyzed from the ALS CARE Database on the use of NPPV in patients with FVC less than 50% of predicted and probable or definite ALS based on modified El Escorial criteria. Of the 403 eligible patients, 146 (36%) used NPPV. NPPV compliance was strongly correlated with symptoms of dyspnea and orthopnea as well as with the use of other therapies including PEG tubes, augmentative speech devices, and riluzole. Male gender and household income >$80,000 were also associated with higher NPPV use. There was no correlation between age, race, type of insurance, forced vital capacity, duration of symptoms, ALSFRS-R, caregiver burden or quality of life with the use of NPPV. These data suggest that the factors which are most closely associated with NPPV utilization are symptomatic orthopnea and dyspnea. The findings may be useful in designing prospective studies to examine the factors which might explain the underutilization of NPPV and the optimal use of this treatment.