Browsing by keyword "advance care planning"
Now showing items 1-3 of 3
-
Advance care planning among Medicare beneficiaries with dementia undergoing surgeryIMPORTANCE: Advance care planning (ACP), in which patients or their surrogates discuss goals and preferences for care with physicians, attorneys, friends, and family, is an important approach to help align goals with actual treatment. ACP may be particularly valuable in patients with advanced serious illnesses such as Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) for whom surgery carries significant risks. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, timing, and factors associated with ACP billing in Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD undergoing nontrauma inpatient surgery. DESIGN: This national cohort study analyzes Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 to 2017. All patients had a 6-month lookback and follow-up period. SETTING: National Medicare fee-for-service data. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with ADRD, defined according to the Chronic Conditions Warehouse, undergoing inpatient surgery from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. EXPOSURES: Patient demographics, medical history, and procedural outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME: ACP billing codes from 6 months before to 6 months after admission for inpatient surgery. RESULTS: This study included 289,428 patients with ADRD undergoing surgery, of whom 21,754 (7.5%) had billed ACP within the 6 months before and after surgical admission. In a multivariable analysis, patients of white race, male sex, and residence in the Southern and Midwestern United States were at the highest risk of not receiving ACP. Of all patients who received ACP, 5960 (27.4%) did so before surgery while 12,658 (52.8%) received ACP after surgery. Timing of ACP after surgery was associated with an Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3 or higher (1.23, p = 0.045) and major postoperative complication or death (odds ratio 1.52, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Overall ACP billing code use is low among Medicare patients with ADRD undergoing surgery. Billed ACP appears to have a reactive pattern, occurring most commonly after surgery and in association with postoperative mortality and complications. Additional study is warranted to understand barriers to use.
-
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advance Care Planning: Results of a Statewide Population-Based SurveyBACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning other than advance directives among population-based samples of adults across the lifespan. METHODS: Using data from a statewide random-digit dial telephone survey of adults 18 years or older (n = 1851), we investigated racial and ethnic differences in (1) designation of a healthcare agent (HCA); and (2) communication of goals, values, and preferences for end-of-life care with healthcare providers, a HCA, or other family members and friends. RESULTS: Less than half (44%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 41.3%-47.0%) of all participants had named a HCA. In multivariable analyses, participants who identified as Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.7) or non-Hispanic other (aOR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.9) were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to have named a HCA. Only 14.5% (95% CI = 12.6%-16.5%) of all participants had ever had a conversation with a healthcare provider about their end-of-life care wishes, with no differences by race/ethnicity. Over half (53.9%, 95% CI = 51.0%-56.8%) of all participants reported having had conversations with someone other than a healthcare provider about their end-of-life wishes. In multivariable analyses, non-Hispanic whites were more likely than Hispanics (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.7), black/African Americans (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9), and non-Hispanic others (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-1.0) to report having had such conversations. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic minorities may be disadvantaged in the quality of care they receive if they have a serious illness and are unable to make decisions for themselves because most have not talked to anyone about their goals, values, or preferences for care.
-
US clinicians' perspectives on advance care planning for persons with dementia: A qualitative studyBackground: Although advance care planning (ACP) for persons with dementia (PWD) can promote patient-centered care by aligning future healthcare with patient values, few PWD have documented ACPs for reasons incompletely understood. The objective of this paper is to characterize the perceived value of, barriers to, and successful strategies for completing ACP for PWD as reported by frontline clinicians. Methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews (August 2018-December 2019) with clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, social workers) at 11 US health systems. Interviews asked clinicians about their approaches to ACP with PWDs, including how ACP was initiated, what was discussed, how carepartners were involved, how decision-making was approached, and how decision-making capacity was assessed. Results: Of 75 participating generalist and specialty clinicians from across the United States, 61% reported conducting ACP with PWD, of whom 19% conducted ACP as early as possible with PWD. Three themes emerged: value of early ACP preserves PWD's autonomy in cases of differing PWD carepartner values, acute medical crises, and clinician paternalism; barriers to ACP with PWD including the dynamic and subjective assessment of patient decision-making capacity, inconsistent awareness of cognitive impairment by clinicians, and the need to balance patient and family carepartner involvement; and strategies to support ACP include clarifying clinicians' roles in ACP, standardizing clinicians' approach to PWD and their carepartners, and making time for ACP and decision-making assessments that allow PWD and carepartner involvement regardless of the patients' capacity. Conclusions: Clinicians found early ACP for PWD valuable in promoting patient-centered care among an at-risk population. In sharing their perspectives on conducting ACP for PWD, clinicians described challenges that are amenable to changes in training, workflow, and material support for clinician time. Clinical practices need sustainable scheduling and financial support models.