Browsing by keyword "molecular modeling"
Now showing items 1-3 of 3
-
Structural basis of substrate specificity in human cytidine deaminase family APOBEC3sThe human cytidine deaminase family of APOBEC3s (A3s) plays critical roles in both innate immunity and the development of cancers. A3s comprise seven functionally overlapping but distinct members that can be exploited as nucleotide base editors for treating genetic diseases. Although overall structurally similar, A3s have vastly varying deamination activity and substrate preferences. Recent crystal structures of ssDNA-bound A3s together with experimental studies have provided some insights into distinct substrate specificities among the family members. However, the molecular interactions responsible for their distinct biological functions and how structure regulates substrate specificity are not clear. In this study, we identified the structural basis of substrate specificities in three catalytically active A3 domains whose crystal structures have been previously characterized: A3A, A3B- CTD, and A3G-CTD. Through molecular modeling and dynamic simulations, we found an interdependency between ssDNA substrate binding conformation and nucleotide sequence specificity. In addition to the U-shaped conformation seen in the crystal structure with the CTC0 motif, A3A can accommodate the CCC0 motif when ssDNA is in a more linear (L) conformation. A3B can also bind both U- and L-shaped ssDNA, unlike A3G, which can stably recognize only linear ssDNA. These varied conformations are stabilized by sequence-specific interactions with active site loops 1 and 7, which are highly variable among A3s. Our results explain the molecular basis of previously observed substrate specificities in A3s and have implications for designing A3-specific inhibitors for cancer therapy as well as engineering base-editing systems for gene therapy.
-
Structural Mechanism of Substrate Specificity In Human Cytidine Deaminase Family APOBEC3sAPOBEC3s (A3s) are a family of human cytidine deaminases that play important roles in both innate immunity and cancer. A3s protect host cells against retroviruses and retrotransposons by deaminating cytosine to uracil on foreign pathogenic genomes. However, when mis-regulated, A3s can cause heterogeneities in host genome and thus promote cancer and the development of therapeutic resistance. The family consists of seven members with either one (A3A, A3C and A3H) or two zinc-binding domains (A3B, A3D, A3D and A3G). Despite overall similarity, A3 proteins have distinct deamination activity and substrate specificity. Over the past years, several crystal and NMR structures of apo A3s and DNA/RNA-bound A3s have been determined. These structures have suggested the importance of the loops around the active site for nucleotide specificity and binding. However, the structural mechanism underlying A3 activity and substrate specificity requires further examination. Using a combination of computational molecular modeling and parallel molecular dynamics (pMD) simulations followed by experimental verifications, I investigated the roles of active site residues and surrounding loops in determining the substrate specificity and RNA versus DNA binding among A3s. Starting with A3B, I revealed the structural basis and gatekeeper residue for DNA binding. I also identified a unique auto-inhibited conformation in A3B that restricts access to the active site and may underlie lower catalytic activity compared to the highly similar A3A. Besides, I investigated the structural mechanism of substrate specificity and ssDNA binding conformation in A3s. I found an interdependence between substrate conformation and specificity. Specifically, the linear DNA conformation helps accommodate CC dinucleotide motif while the U-shaped conformation prefers TC. I also identified the molecular mechanisms of substrate sequence specificity at -1’ and -2’ positions. Characterization of substrate binding to A3A revealed that intra-DNA interactions may be responsible for the specificity in A3A. Finally, I investigated the structural mechanism for exclusion of RNA from A3G catalytic activity using similar methods. Overall, the comprehensive analysis of A3s in this thesis shed light into the structural mechanism of substrate specificity and broaden the understanding of molecular interactions underlying the biological function of these enzymes. These results have implications for designing specific A3 inhibitors as well as base editing systems for gene therapy.
-
T cell epitope engineering: an avian H7N9 influenza vaccine strategy for pandemic preparedness and responseThe delayed availability of vaccine during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic created a sense of urgency to better prepare for the next influenza pandemic. Advancements in manufacturing technology, speed and capacity have been achieved but vaccine effectiveness remains a significant challenge. Here, we describe a novel vaccine design strategy called immune engineering in the context of H7N9 influenza vaccine development. The approach combines immunoinformatic and structure modeling methods to promote protective antibody responses against H7N9 hemagglutinin (HA) by engineering whole antigens to carry seasonal influenza HA memory CD4(+) T cell epitopes - without perturbing native antigen structure - by galvanizing HA-specific memory helper T cells that support sustained antibody development against the native target HA. The premise for this vaccine concept rests on (i) the significance of CD4(+) T cell memory to influenza immunity, (ii) the essential role CD4(+) T cells play in development of neutralizing antibodies, (iii) linked specificity of HA-derived CD4(+) T cell epitopes to antibody responses, (iv) the structural plasticity of HA and (v) an illustration of improved antibody response to a prototype engineered recombinant H7-HA vaccine. Immune engineering can be applied to development of vaccines against pandemic concerns, including avian influenza, as well as other difficult targets.
