Browsing by keyword "remdesivir"
Now showing items 1-6 of 6
-
Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with dysregulated inflammation. The effects of combination treatment with baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, plus remdesivir are not known. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating baricitinib plus remdesivir in hospitalized adults with Covid-19. All the patients received remdesivir ( < /=10 days) and either baricitinib ( < /=14 days) or placebo (control). The primary outcome was the time to recovery. The key secondary outcome was clinical status at day 15. RESULTS: A total of 1033 patients underwent randomization (with 515 assigned to combination treatment and 518 to control). Patients receiving baricitinib had a median time to recovery of 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 8), as compared with 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 9) with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.32; P = 0.03), and a 30% higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at enrollment had a time to recovery of 10 days with combination treatment and 18 days with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.08). The 28-day mortality was 5.1% in the combination group and 7.8% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.09). Serious adverse events were less frequent in the combination group than in the control group (16.0% vs. 21.0%; difference, -5.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.8 to -0.3; P = 0.03), as were new infections (5.9% vs. 11.2%; difference, -5.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.7 to -1.9; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04401579.).
-
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Preliminary ReportBACKGROUND: Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), none have yet been shown to be efficacious. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 with evidence of lower respiratory tract involvement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. RESULTS: A total of 1063 patients underwent randomization. The data and safety monitoring board recommended early unblinding of the results on the basis of findings from an analysis that showed shortened time to recovery in the remdesivir group. Preliminary results from the 1059 patients (538 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo) with data available after randomization indicated that those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 11 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 12), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 19) in those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.55; P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality by 14 days were 7.1% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.04). Serious adverse events were reported for 114 of the 541 patients in the remdesivir group who underwent randomization (21.1%) and 141 of the 522 patients in the placebo group who underwent randomization (27.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 and evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACCT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.).
-
Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 1)Remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral agent administered intravenously, was developed and studied as a potential treatment for Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus infection. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies found antiviral activity for remdesivir against corona-like viruses, including Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), the circulating human coronaviruses HCoV-OC42 and HCoV-229E, and SARS-CoV-2. Currently, the effectiveness of remdesivir is being tested as a treatment for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and has been authorized for emergency use for treating COVID-19, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the United States, and in other countries. The American College of Physicians (ACP) Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) based these rapid and living practice points on a systematic evidence review conducted by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Evidence Synthesis Program in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This version of the practice points, based on a search completed on 3 June 2020 and updated through 31 August 2020, was approved by the ACP's Executive Committee of Board of Regents on behalf of the Board of Regents on 14 August 2020 and submitted to Annals of Internal Medicine on 13 August 2020. Because many studies are planned or under way, literature surveillance is ongoing, with updates currently planned for every 2 months through December 2021. The target audience for these practice points includes clinicians and the public. The target patient population includes all nonpregnant patients with COVID-19.
-
Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2)Practice points for clinicians developed by the American College of Physicians addressing these questions: What are the effectiveness and harms of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Do effectiveness and harms in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 vary by symptom duration, disease severity, and treatment duration?
-
Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2, Update Alert 3)This is an update of the American College of Physicians' living, rapid practice points on the use of remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19. This update is based on an updated living, rapid systematic review that included studies published through 19 October 2021 and identified 2 new studies meeting inclusion criteria.
-
Update Alert: Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2)This is an update of the American College of Physicians' living, rapid practice points about using remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19, which is based on an updated systematic review done through 10 May 2021. The evidence update identified 1 new study that could inform Practice Point 1. No new studies were identified as supporting evidence for Practice Points 2 or 3. The new study did not have an effect on our prior conclusions and resulted in no changes to the practice points (see the next section and the Supplement). We have changed the term mechanical ventilation to invasive ventilation to better reflect most of the patient populations informing the practice points. We define invasive ventilation as administering supplemental oxygen with positive pressure to the lungs via an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. The Supplement summarizes the evidence, evidence gaps, and clinical considerations.

