Browsing by keyword "risk management"
Now showing items 1-2 of 2
-
Shortened cataract surgery by standardisation of the perioperative protocol according to the Joint Commission International accreditation: a retrospective observational studyOBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of standardisation of the perioperative protocol based on the Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation guidelines for operating time in cataract surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single centre in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Between March 2014 and June 2016, 3127 patients underwent cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia including 2581 and 546 patients before and after JCI accreditation, respectively. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We compared three time periods, comprising the preprocedure/surgery time (pre-PT), PT and post-PT, and total PT (TPT) of cataract surgery between patients before and after JCI accreditation, by regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and cataract surgery-associated confounders. RESULTS: The main outcomes were pre-PT, PT, post-PT and TPT. Pre-PT (19.8+/-10.5 vs 13.9+/-8.5 min, p < 0.001) and post-PT (3.5+/-4.6 vs 2.6+/-2.1 min, p < 0.001) significantly decreased after JCI accreditation, while PT did not significantly change (16.8+/-6.7 vs 16.2+/-6.3 min, p=0.065). Consequently, TPT decreased on average by 7.3 min per person after JCI accreditation (40.1+/-13.4 vs 32.8+/-10.9 min, p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, pre-PT (beta=-5.82 min, 95% CI -6.75 to -4.88), PT (beta=-0.76 min, 95% CI -1.34 to -1.71), post-PT (beta=-0.85 min, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.45) and TPT (beta=-7.43 min, 95% CI -8.61 to -6.24) were significantly shortened after JCI accreditation. CONCLUSION: Perioperative protocol standardisation, based on JCI accreditation, shortened TPT in cataract surgery under local anaesthesia.
-
[Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Colombian surgical and medical patients: results for Colombia of the ENDORSE study]INTRODUCTION: More information is needed on the risk of venous thromboembolism in the hospital setting, and on patterns of use of thromboprophylaxis, as advocated in consensus guidelines.ENDORSE was an international study aimed at evaluating hospital venous thromboembolism prevention practices in medical and surgical patients. OBJECTIVES: The risk of venous thromboembolism was evaluated along with the use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical subjects; these data were compared with the international sample from the ENDORSE study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participating institutions in Colombia were selected arbitrarily. The medical charts for medical and surgical patients were evaluated randomly. The 2004 American College of Chest Physician guidelines were used to evaluate risk of venous thromboembolism and adherence to recommended thromboprophylaxis regimens. RESULTS: The study included 761 subjects (218 surgical, 543 medical) located in five acute care hospitals; 49% of these subjects were considered at risk of venous thromboembolism (40% medical, 72% surgical), compared with 52% in the international sample. Prophylaxis use was higher in medical patients at risk (63.7%, n = 137) than in surgical patients (48.4%, n = 76; p = 0.01). Compared with the international sample, the use of prophylaxis in Colombia was greater in medical patients (63.7% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.003), but lower in surgical patients (48.4% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Participating Colombian centers treat patients at risk of venous thromboembolism similarly to other participant countries, but appropriate prophylaxis was prescribed more frequently to medical patients. Greater efforts are needed, both in Colombia and around the world, to improve rates of appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in at-risk subjects.
