BACKGROUND: The Life's Simple 7 (LS7) is a guiding metric for primordial/primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about the prevalence and distribution of LS7 metrics in patients with an acute coronary syndrome at the time of hospitalization. METHODS: Data were obtained from patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome at 6 hospitals in Central Massachusetts and Georgia (2011-2013). The LS7 assessed patient's smoking, diet, and physical activity based on self-reported measures, and patients' body mass index, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol and glucose levels were abstracted from medical records. All items were operationalized into 3 categories: poor (0), intermediate (1), or ideal (2). A total summary cardiovascular health score (0-14) was obtained and categorized into tertiles (0-5, 6-7, and 8-14). RESULTS: The average age of study participants (n=1110) was 59.6 years and 35% were women. Cardiovascular health scores ranged from 0-12 (mean=6.2). Patients with higher scores were older, white, had lower burden of comorbidities, had fewer symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress, better quality of life, more social support, and greater healthcare activation. One-third of patients had only 1 ideal cardiovascular health measure, less than 1% had 5, and no participant had more than 5 ideal factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients with acute coronary syndrome have poor cardiovascular health. Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics differed across cardiovascular health groups. These findings highlight potential areas for educational and therapeutic interventions to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and promote cardiovascular health in adult men and women.

Purpose: This review systematically identified and critically appraised the available literature that has examined the association between religiosity and/or spirituality (R/S) and quality of life (QOL) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: We searched several electronic online databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) from database inception until October 2017. Included articles were peer-reviewed, published in English, and quantitatively examined the association between R/S and QOL. We assessed the methodological quality of each included study. Results: The 15 articles included were published between 2002 and 2017. Most studies were conducted in the US and enrolled patients with heart failure. Sixteen dimensions of R/S were assessed with a variety of instruments. QOL domains examined were global, health-related, and disease-specific QOL. Ten studies reported a significant positive association between R/S and QOL, with higher spiritual well-being, intrinsic religiousness, and frequency of church attendance positively related with mental and emotional well-being. Approximately half of the included studies reported negative or null associations. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that higher levels of R/S may be related to better QOL among patients with CVD, with varying associations depending on the R/S dimension and QOL domain assessed. Future longitudinal studies in large patient samples with different CVDs and designs are needed to better understand how R/S may influence QOL. More uniformity in assessing R/S would enhance the comparability of results across studies. Understanding the influence of R/S on QOL would promote a holistic approach in managing patients with CVD.