• Login
    Search 
    •   Home
    • Search
    •   Home
    • Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Filter by Category

    Date Issued2009 (1)AuthorAllison, Jeroan J. (1)
    Arora, T. (1)
    Chen, L. (1)Colon-Emeric, Cathleen S. (1)Curtis, Jeffrey R. (1)View MoreUMass Chan AffiliationDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences (1)Document TypeJournal Article (1)KeywordBioinformatics (1)Biostatistics (1)Epidemiology (1)Health Services Research (1)Osteoporosis (1)View MoreJournalOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (1)

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
     

    Search

    Show Advanced FiltersHide Advanced Filters

    Filters

    • Publications
    • Profiles

    Now showing items 1-1 of 1

    • List view
    • Grid view
    • Sort Options:
    • Relevance
    • Title Asc
    • Title Desc
    • Issue Date Asc
    • Issue Date Desc
    • Results Per Page:
    • 5
    • 10
    • 20
    • 40
    • 60
    • 80
    • 100

    • 1CSV
    • 1RefMan
    • 1EndNote
    • 1BibTex
    • Selective Export
    • Select All
    • Help
    Thumbnail

    Do physicians within the same practice setting manage osteoporosis patients similarly? Implications for implementation research

    Curtis, Jeffrey R.; Arora, T.; Xi, J.; Silver, A.; Allison, Jeroan J.; Chen, L.; Saag, Kenneth G.; Schenck, Anna P.; Westfall, Andrew O.; Colon-Emeric, Cathleen S. (2009-03-26)
    Using data from long-term glucocorticoid users and long-term care residents, we evaluated osteoporosis prescribing patterns related to physician behavior and common practice settings. We found no significant clustering effect for common practice setting, suggesting that osteoporosis quality improvement (QI) efforts may be able to ignore this factor in designing QI interventions. INTRODUCTION: Patients' receipt of prescription therapies are significantly influenced by their physician's prescribing patterns. If physicians in the same practice setting influence one another's prescribing, evidence implementation interventions must consider targeting the practice as well as individual physicians to achieve maximal success. METHODS: We examined receipt of osteoporosis treatment (OP Rx) from two prior evidence implementation studies: long-term glucocorticoid (GC) users and nursing home (NH) residents with prior fracture or osteoporosis. Common practice setting was defined as doctors practicing at the same address or in the same nursing home. Alternating logistic regression evaluated the relationship between OP Rx, common practice setting, and individual physician treatment patterns. RESULTS: Among 6,281 GC users in 1,296 practices, the proportion receiving OP Rx in each practice was 6-100%. Among 779 NH residents in 66 nursing homes, the proportion in each NH receiving OP Rx was 0-100%. In both, there was no significant relationship between receipt of OP Rx and common practice setting after accounting for treatment pattern of individual physicians. CONCLUSION: Physicians practicing together were not more alike in prescribing osteoporosis medications than those in different practices. Osteoporosis quality improvement may be able to ignore common practice settings and maximize statistical power by targeting individual physicians.
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.