In this Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase II study, dibromodulcitol (DBD) and a combination of actinomycin D, hydroxyurea, and cyclophosphamide (AHC) were compared with methyl-CCNU, the current ECOG standard, in patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for disseminated malignant melanoma. The response rates were 6% (3/50) for AHC, 9% (3/34) for DBD, and 14% (7/49) for methyl-CCNU. Median survival times were 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively. Neither regimen appears to offer any advantage over methyl-CCNU as front-line therapy for patients with disseminated melanoma.

Patients with objectively measurable soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and mesotheliomas were treated with dibromodulcitol (DBD) (180 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-10 q4 wks.). ICRF-159 (300 mg/m2 p.o. tid days 1-3 q4 wks), or maytansine (MAYT) (1.5 mg/m2 I.V. q3 wks.). Forty-five evaluable patients received DBD, 47 MAYT, and 37 ICRF-159. Only patients who had had their histopathologic diagnoses confirmed by a pathology reference panel were included in the final analysis. Two patients had objective partial responses: a patient with osteosarcoma who responded to DBD and a patient with fibrosarcoma who had a partial response of brief duration to ICRF-159. Approximately 70% of the patients treated with each drug were of ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and over half had moderate or worse toxicity. It seems unlikely that these drugs have significant therapeutic activity for common mesenchymal malignancies.