• Login
    Search 
    •   Home
    • Search
    •   Home
    • Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Filter by Category

    Date Issued2022 (2)2021 (2)2020 (3)AuthorEtxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar (7)
    Forciea, Mary Ann (7)
    Humphrey, Linda L. (7)Miller, Matthew C. (7)Qaseem, Amir (7)View MoreUMass Chan AffiliationDepartment of Medicine (6)Department of Medicine, Division of Community Internal Medicine (1)Document TypeJournal Article (7)KeywordInfectious Disease (7)Virus Diseases (7)COVID-19 (6)Health Services Administration (5)Health Services Research (3)View MoreJournalAnnals of internal medicine (7)

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
     

    Search

    Show Advanced FiltersHide Advanced Filters

    Filters

    • Publications
    • Profiles

    Now showing items 1-7 of 7

    • List view
    • Grid view
    • Sort Options:
    • Relevance
    • Title Asc
    • Title Desc
    • Issue Date Asc
    • Issue Date Desc
    • Results Per Page:
    • 5
    • 10
    • 20
    • 40
    • 60
    • 80
    • 100

    • 7CSV
    • 7RefMan
    • 7EndNote
    • 7BibTex
    • Selective Export
    • Select All
    • Help
    Thumbnail

    Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2, Update Alert 3)

    Qaseem, Amir; Yost, Jennifer; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Abraham, George; Jokela, Janet A.; Forciea, Mary Ann; Miller, Matthew C.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2022-03-01)
    This is an update of the American College of Physicians' living, rapid practice points on the use of remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19. This update is based on an updated living, rapid systematic review that included studies published through 19 October 2021 and identified 2 new studies meeting inclusion criteria.
    Thumbnail

    What Is the Antibody Response and Role in Conferring Natural Immunity After SARS-CoV-2 Infection? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2)

    Qaseem, Amir; Yost, Jennifer; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Forciea, Mary Ann; Abraham, George; Miller, Matthew C.; Obley, Adam J.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2022-01-25)
    DESCRIPTION: The Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) of the American College of Physicians (ACP) developed these living, rapid practice points to summarize the current best available evidence on the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. This is version 2 of the ACP practice points, which serves to update version 1, published on 16 March 2021. These practice points do not evaluate vaccine-acquired immunity or cellular immunity. METHODS: The SMPC developed this version of the living, rapid practice points based on an updated living, rapid, systematic review conducted by the Portland VA Research Foundation and funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PRACTICE POINT 1: Do not use SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PRACTICE POINT 2: Do not use SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests to predict the degree or duration of natural immunity conferred by antibodies against reinfection, including natural immunity against different variants. RETIREMENT FROM LIVING STATUS: Although natural immunity remains a topic of scientific interest, this topic is being retired from living status given the availability of effective vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 and widespread recommendations for and prevalence of their use. Currently, vaccination is the best clinical recommendation for preventing infection, reinfection, and serious illness from SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.
    Thumbnail

    What Is the Antibody Response and Role in Conferring Natural Immunity After SARS-CoV-2 Infection? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 1)

    Qaseem, Amir; Yost, Jennifer; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Forciea, Mary Ann; Abraham, George M.; Miller, Matthew C.; Obley, Adam J.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2021-03-16)
    Description: The widespread availability of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests raises important questions for clinicians, patients, and public health professionals related to the appropriate use and interpretation of these tests. The Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) of the American College of Physicians developed these rapid, living practice points to summarize the current and best available evidence on the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, antibody durability after initial infection with SARS-CoV-2, and antibody protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: The SMPC developed these rapid, living practice points based on a rapid and living systematic evidence review done by the Portland VA Research Foundation and funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ongoing literature surveillance is planned through December 2021. When new studies are identified and a full update of the evidence review is published, the SMPC will assess the new evidence and any effect on the practice points. Practice Points: Practice Point 1: Do not use SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Practice Point 2: Antibody tests can be useful for the purpose of estimating community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Practice Point 3: Current evidence is uncertain to predict presence, level, or durability of natural immunity conferred by SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against reinfection (after SARS-CoV-2 infection).
    Thumbnail

    Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2)

    Qaseem, Amir; Yost, Jennifer; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Abraham, George M.; Jokela, Janet A.; Forciea, Mary Ann; Miller, Matthew C.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2021-02-09)
    Practice points for clinicians developed by the American College of Physicians addressing these questions: What are the effectiveness and harms of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Do effectiveness and harms in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 vary by symptom duration, disease severity, and treatment duration?
    Thumbnail

    Should Remdesivir Be Used for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19? Rapid, Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 1)

    Qaseem, Amir; Yost, Jennifer; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Abraham, George M.; Jokela, Janet A.; Forciea, Mary Ann; Miller, Matthew C.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2020-10-05)
    Remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral agent administered intravenously, was developed and studied as a potential treatment for Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus infection. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies found antiviral activity for remdesivir against corona-like viruses, including Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), the circulating human coronaviruses HCoV-OC42 and HCoV-229E, and SARS-CoV-2. Currently, the effectiveness of remdesivir is being tested as a treatment for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and has been authorized for emergency use for treating COVID-19, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the United States, and in other countries. The American College of Physicians (ACP) Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) based these rapid and living practice points on a systematic evidence review conducted by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Evidence Synthesis Program in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This version of the practice points, based on a search completed on 3 June 2020 and updated through 31 August 2020, was approved by the ACP's Executive Committee of Board of Regents on behalf of the Board of Regents on 14 August 2020 and submitted to Annals of Internal Medicine on 13 August 2020. Because many studies are planned or under way, literature surveillance is ongoing, with updates currently planned for every 2 months through December 2021. The target audience for these practice points includes clinicians and the public. The target patient population includes all nonpregnant patients with COVID-19.
    Thumbnail

    Use of N95, Surgical, and Cloth Masks to Prevent COVID-19 in Health Care and Community Settings: Living Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 1)

    Qaseem, Amir; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Yost, Jennifer; Miller, Matthew C.; Abraham, George M.; Obley, Adam J.; Forciea, Mary Ann; Jokela, Janet A.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2020-06-18)
    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spreads among persons in close proximity through droplets, although evidence is still emerging regarding potential airborne transmission. Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care and community settings is a major priority, especially in the absence of an effective vaccine or treatment. The use of respiratory personal protective equipment (PPE) may decrease the risk for respiratory infection, although controversy exists around the appropriate types of masks and the situations in which they should be used in community and health care settings for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The following practice points (Table 1) are intended for clinicians, patients, and the public. Data on SARS-CoV-2 are limited. These practice points are based on the best available evidence on the effectiveness of N95 respirators, surgical masks, and cloth masks in reducing transmission of infection with SARS-CoV-1, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and influenza-like or other respiratory viruses in community and health care settings. Evidence about reuse or extended use of N95 respirators in health care settings was also considered.
    Thumbnail

    Should Clinicians Use Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine Alone or in Combination With Azithromycin for the Prophylaxis or Treatment of COVID-19

    Qaseem, Amir; Yost, Jennifer; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Itziar; Miller, Matthew C.; Abraham, George M.; Obley, Adam Jacob; Forciea, Mary Ann; Jokela, Janet A.; Humphrey, Linda L. (2020-05-13)
    Using chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, with or without azithromycin, to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) after infection with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) or to treat COVID-19 began to receive attention following preliminary reports from in vitro and human studies. While multiple studies are planned or under way, it is imperative to continually synthesize the results from the best available evidence to inform point-of-care decisions about the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. These practice points are based on a rapid and living systematic evidence review conducted by the University of Connecticut Health Outcomes, Policy, and Evidence Synthesis Group and will be updated as new evidence becomes available. The practice points development and update methods are included in the Appendix. This version of the practice points, based on an evidence review conducted on 17 April 2020, was approved by the American College of Physicians Board of Regents on 4 May 2020 and submitted to Annals of Internal Medicine on 6 May 2020.
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.