OBJECTIVES: To investigate variation among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in prevalence and management of thrombocytopenia in infants and(SNAP). Platelet counts in the first 12 hours after birth and on day 3 of life were abstracted from the infants' medical records. Thrombocytopenia was determined from the lowest platelet count in each of these time periods. RESULTS: There was variability in rates of thrombocytopenia among NICUs, even after controlling for risk factors (e.g., SNAP, small for gestational (SGA) age and maternal hypertension). One site had a high prevalence of thrombocytopenia, but the lowest percentage of infants with thrombocytopenia who received platelet transfusions. After controlling for SNAP, GA, SGA, Apgar score and incidence of thrombocytopenia, the odds of receiving platelets at this site, relative to the site with the highest transfusion rate, was 0.10 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study finds a 10-fold variation among NICU in the administration of platelets to their thrombocytopenic infants that cannot be explained by presence of thrombocytopenia or illness severity.

OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of narcotic administration for medically treated neonates in different neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to compare treated and untreated neonates to assess whether narcotics provided advantages or disadvantages for short-term outcomes, such as cardiovascular stability (ie, blood pressure and heart rate), hyperbilirubinemia, duration of respiratory support, growth, and the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: The medical charts of neonates weighing less than 1500 g, admitted to 6 NICUs (A-F), were abstracted. Neonates who had a chest tube or who had undergone surgery were excluded from the study, leaving the records of 1171 neonates. We modeled outcomes by linear or logistic regression, controlling for birth weight ( or =20) using the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP), and adjusted for NICU. RESULTS: Narcotic use varied by birth weight (g, 21%; 750-999 g, 13%; and 1000-1499 g, 8%), illness severity (low, 9%; medium, 19%; and high, 37%), day (1, 11%; 3, 6%; and 14, 2%), and NICU. We restricted analyses to the 1018 neonates who received mechanical ventilation on day 1. Logistic regression, adjusting for birth weight and SNAP, confirmed a 28.6-fold variation in narcotic administration (odds ratios, 4.1-28.6 vs NICU A). Several short-term outcomes also were associated with narcotic use, including more than 33 g of fluid retention on day 3 and a higher direct bilirubin level (6.8 micromol/L higher [0.4 mg/dL higher], P = .03). There were no differences in weight gain at 14 and 28 days or mechanical ventilatory support on days 14 and 28. Narcotic use was not associated with differences in worst blood pressure or heart rate or with increased length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a 28.6-fold variation among NICUs in narcotic administration in very low-birth-weight neonates. We were unable to detect any major advantages or disadvantages of narcotic use. We did not assess iatrogenic abstinence syndrome or long-term outcomes. These results indicate the need for randomized trials to rationalize these widely differing practices.