• Login
    Search 
    •   Home
    • Search
    •   Home
    • Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Filter by Category

    Date Issued2017 (1)2009 (2)Author
    Klitzman, Robert (3)
    Lidz, Charles W. (3)Appelbaum, Paul S. (2)Pivovarova, Ekaterina (1)UMass Chan AffiliationDepartment of Psychiatry (3)Systems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center (1)Document TypeJournal Article (3)KeywordBioethics and Medical Ethics (2)Health Services Research (2)Humans (2)Psychiatry (2)Psychiatry and Psychology (2)View MoreJournalIRB (1)JAMA (1)The Hastings Center report (1)

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
     

    Search

    Show Advanced FiltersHide Advanced Filters

    Filters

    • Publications
    • Profiles

    Now showing items 1-3 of 3

    • List view
    • Grid view
    • Sort Options:
    • Relevance
    • Title Asc
    • Title Desc
    • Issue Date Asc
    • Issue Date Desc
    • Results Per Page:
    • 5
    • 10
    • 20
    • 40
    • 60
    • 80
    • 100

    • 3CSV
    • 3RefMan
    • 3EndNote
    • 3BibTex
    • Selective Export
    • Select All
    • Help
    Thumbnail

    Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy

    Klitzman, Robert; Pivovarova, Ekaterina; Lidz, Charles W. (2017-05-23)
    Of all the issues raised by the NIH single-IRB policy, the relationship between the single IRB and the participating sites is possibly the most complex. There are 3 critical aspects that academic institutions, researchers, and policy makers will have to resolve before implementation of the new policy: (1) the relationship between the single IRB and the local institutions, including the local IRBs; (2) the collection and incorporation of local knowledge in the single-IRB review; and (3) the relationship between the single IRB and local researchers. These issues involve fundamental legal, ethical, institutional, and policy tensions that will profoundly shape the costs and effectiveness of future multisite research involving human research participants.
    Thumbnail

    Voluntariness of consent to research: a preliminary empirical investigation

    Appelbaum, Paul S.; Lidz, Charles W.; Klitzman, Robert (2009-12-26)
    Thumbnail

    Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model

    Appelbaum, Paul S.; Lidz, Charles W.; Klitzman, Robert (2009-02-14)
    A good deal of policy and practice in human subjects research aims to ensure that when subjects consent to research, they do so voluntarily. To date, however, voluntariness and its impairment have been poorly conceptualized and studied. The legal doctrine of informed consent could provide a useful model.
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.