The numerous large-scale randomized clinical trials performed during the last decade on either unfractionated heparin, or low molecular weight heparin have not been able to demonstrate undisputed benefits in patients with acute ischemic stroke, compared with no treatment or aspirin. However, a large number of these trials, including the International Stroke Trial and Chinese Acute Stroke Trial, exhibit severe methodological limitations and need to be interpreted with caution. Knowledge of thromboembolism pathophysiology and clinical experience leads to the theory that heparins will prevent red thrombus formation, propagation and embolism. Heparins effectively prevent venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. More trials are needed to test heparins in patients whose cardiocerebrovascular lesions are better defined by newer neuroimaging techniques. The efficacy of heparins has not been adequately tested in patients with defined stroke subtypes and occlusive vascular lesions. Heparins should not be indiscriminately given to all patients with acute ischemic stroke. High-quality, randomized trials that adequately study heparin use in patients using modern technology for vascular lesions and stroke subtypes are lacking, and need to be performed.

The current status of thrombolytic therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration is intravenous recombinant plasminogen activator given within 3 h of the onset of ischemic stroke. Intra-arterial therapy is possible for up to 6 h but is not Food and Drug Administration-approved for this purpose. Based on current radiologic methods (i.e., magnetic resonance imaging and perfusion computed tomography scans), it is being increasingly realized that the time window for effective thrombolytic therapy is variable, and salvageable tissue in the form of the ischemic penumbra may exist for longer periods of time and could therefore offer a greater time window based on these imaging studies. Development of an effective neuroprotective drug would greatly enhance the stability of the penumbra and offer further opportunities for extending the time window for reperfusion.

It is increasingly clear that even a small reduction in blood pressure results in a substantial risk reduction of vascular events including ischemic stroke. Recently, several comparative prospective trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers have demonstrated that, for equivalent reductions in blood pressure, these drugs may confer a greater effect on the prevention of primary and recurrent ischemic stroke compared with other antihypertensive medications. Given this information from prospective randomized trials, it appears that this class of drugs should be the first-line treatment for hypertension in patients at risk of a first or recurrent ischemic stroke. This review will critically assess the scientific basis and rationale of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers in primary and secondary stroke prevention.