The Sec61 complex performs a dual function in protein translocation across the RER, serving as both the high affinity ribosome receptor and the translocation channel. To define regions of the Sec61 complex that are involved in ribosome binding and translocation promotion, ribosome-stripped microsomes were subjected to limited digestions using proteases with different cleavage specificities. Protein immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific for the NH(2) and COOH terminus of Sec61alpha was used to map the location of proteolysis cleavage sites. We observed a striking correlation between the loss of binding activity for nontranslating ribosomes and the digestion of the COOH- terminal tail or cytoplasmic loop 8 of Sec61alpha. The proteolyzed microsomes were assayed for SRP-independent translocation activity to determine whether high affinity binding of the ribosome to the Sec61 complex is a prerequisite for nascent chain transport. Microsomes that do not bind nontranslating ribosomes at physiological ionic strength remain active in SRP-independent translocation, indicating that the ribosome binding and translocation promotion activities of the Sec61 complex do not strictly correlate. Translocation-promoting activity was most severely inhibited by cleavage of cytosolic loop 6, indicating that this segment is a critical determinant for this function of the Sec61 complex.

Translocation across or integration into the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) membrane is the first step in the intracelluar sorting of proteins in eukaryotic cells. This process is initiated when a signal sequence in the nascent protein chain emerges from the ribosome and is recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP). The resulting SRP-ribosome-nascent chain-complex (SRP-RNC) is targeted to the RER membrane through the concerted action of the SRP and the SRP receptor (SR). The nascent chain is then displaced from SRP and transferred to the translocon, a proteinaceous channel composed of oligomers of the Sec61 complex. To gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of protein translocation, we treated ribosome-stripped micro somes with proteases of different cleavage specificities to sever cytoplasmic domains of SRα, SRβ, TRAM, and the Sec61 complex, and then characterized protein translocation intermediates that accumulate when Sec61α or SRβ is inactivated by proteolysis. We found that GTP hydrolysis by the SRα-SRP complex and dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence are blocked in the absence of a functional Sec61 complex. Experiments using SR-reconstituted proteoliposomes confirmed the assembly of a membrane-bound, GTP-stabilized post-targeting intermediate. These results strongly suggest that the Sec61 complex regulates the GTP hydrolysis cycle of the SRP-SR complex at the stage of signal sequence dissociation from SRP54. This regulatory role of Sec61α is proposed to provide a mechanism that inhibits signal sequence dissociation from SRP54 if the adjacent Sec61 complex is occupied by a translating ribosome, thereby insuring efficient transfer of an RNC from the SRP-SR complex to the translocation channel. We also found that complex formation between SRα and SRP is compromised in the absence of intact SRβ. Results obtained using a soluble system of in vitro translated SRα and SRβ suggest that SRβ is either required for GTP binding to SRα and SRP54 or for stabilizing the SRα-SRP complex. Moreover, using the XTP mutants of SRα and SRP54, we found that XTP cannot support efficient protein translocation in the absence of GTP. The addition of GTP dramatically promotes protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting the GTPase activity of SRβ is required for this process. Further mutagenesis experiments revealed that the GTP-binding pocket of SRβ is involved in dimerization with SRa. All these data demonstrate that SRβ is important in protein translocation and will help elucidate the precise role of SRβ in vivo.

Targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by the concerted action of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor (SR). Ribosome-stripped microsomes were digested with proteases to sever cytoplasmic domains of SRalpha, SRbeta, TRAM, and the Sec61 complex. We characterized protein translocation intermediates that accumulate when Sec61alpha or SRbeta is inactivated by proteolysis. In the absence of a functional Sec61 complex, dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence is blocked. Experiments using SR proteoliposomes confirmed the assembly of a membrane-bound posttargeting intermediate. These results strongly suggest that the Sec61 complex regulates the GTP hydrolysis cycle of the SRP-SR complex at the stage of signal sequence dissociation from SRP54.