Distinct roles for two Galpha-Gbeta interfaces in cell polarity control by a yeast heterotrimeric G protein
Strickfaden, Shelly Catherine ; Pryciak, Peter M.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
*Cell Polarity
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits
GTP-Binding Protein beta Subunits
GTP-Binding Protein gamma Subunits
Guanosine Triphosphate
Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins
Hydrolysis
Models, Biological
Mutation
Phenotype
Pheromones
Protein Binding
Receptors, Pheromone
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
Signal Transduction
Suppression, Genetic
Tropism
Life Sciences
Medicine and Health Sciences
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromones trigger dissociation of a heterotrimeric G protein (Galphabetagamma) into Galpha-guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and Gbetagamma. The Gbetagamma dimer regulates both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade signaling and cell polarization. Here, by independently activating the MAP kinase pathway, we studied the polarity role of Gbetagamma in isolation from its signaling role. MAP kinase signaling alone could induce cell asymmetry but not directional growth. Surprisingly, active Gbetagamma, either alone or with Galpha-GTP, could not organize a persistent polarization axis. Instead, following pheromone gradients (chemotropism) or directional growth without pheromone gradients (de novo polarization) required an intact receptor-Galphabetagamma module and GTP hydrolysis by Galpha. Our results indicate that chemoattractant-induced cell polarization requires continuous receptor-Galphabetagamma communication but not modulation of MAP kinase signaling. To explore regulation of Gbetagamma by Galpha, we mutated Gbeta residues in two structurally distinct Galpha-Gbeta binding interfaces. Polarity control was disrupted only by mutations in the N-terminal interface, and not the Switch interface. Incorporation of these mutations into a Gbeta-Galpha fusion protein, which enforces subunit proximity, revealed that Switch interface dissociation regulates signaling, whereas the N-terminal interface may govern receptor-Galphabetagamma coupling. These findings raise the possibility that the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer can function in a partially dissociated state, tethered by the N-terminal interface.
Source
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Jan;19(1):181-97. Epub 2007 Oct 31. Link to article on publisher's site