If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative [preprint]
Herbert, Carly ; Shi, Qiming ; Kheterpal, Vik ; Nowak, Chris ; Suvarna, Thejas ; Durnam, Basyl ; Schrader, Summer ; Behar, Stephanie ; Naeem, Syed ; Tarrant, Seanan ... show 10 more
Citations
Authors
Shi, Qiming
Kheterpal, Vik
Nowak, Chris
Suvarna, Thejas
Durnam, Basyl
Schrader, Summer
Behar, Stephanie
Naeem, Syed
Tarrant, Seanan
Kalibala, Ben
Singh, Aditi
Gerber, Ben S
Barton, Bruce A
Lin, Honghuang
Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael
Corbie-Smith, Giselle
Kibbe, Warren
Marquez, Juan
Baek, Jonggyu
Hafer, Nathaniel
Gibson, Laura L
O'Connor, Laurel
Broach, John
Heetderks, William
McManus, David D
Soni, Apurv
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
Document Type
Publication Date
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
Importance Wide-spread distribution of rapid-antigen tests is integral to the United States’ strategy to address COVID-19; however, it is estimated that few rapid-antigen test results are reported to local departments of health.
Objective To characterize how often individuals in six communities throughout the United States used a digital assistant to log rapid-antigen test results and report them to their local Department of Health.
Design This prospective cohort study is based on anonymously collected data from the beneficiaries of The Say Yes! Covid Test program, which distributed 3,000,000 rapid antigen tests at no cost to residents of six communities between April and October 2021. We provide a descriptive evaluation of beneficiaries’ use of digital assistant for logging and reporting their rapid antigen test results.
Main Outcome and Measures Number and proportion of tests logged and reported to the Department of Health through the digital assistant
Results A total of 178,785 test kits were ordered by the digital assistant, and 14,398 households used the digital assistant to log 41,465 test results. Overall, a small proportion of beneficiaries used the digital assistant (8%), but over 75% of those who used it reported their rapid antigen test results to their state public health department. The reporting behavior varied between communities and was significantly different for communities that were incentivized for reporting test results (p < 0.001). In all communities, positive tests were less reported than negative tests (60.4% vs 75.5%; p<0.001).
Conclusions and Relevance These results indicate that app-based reporting with incentives may be an effective way to increase reporting of rapid tests for COVID-19; however, increasing the adoption of the digital assistant is a critical first step.
Source
Herbert C, Shi Q, Kheterpal V, Nowak C, Suvarna T, Durnam B, Schrader S, Behar S, Naeem S, Tarrant S, Kalibala B, Singh A, Gerber B, Barton B, Lin H, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Corbie-Smith G, Kibbe W, Marquez J, Baek J, Hafer N, Gibson L, O'Connor L, Broach J, Heetderks W, McManus D, Soni A. If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Apr 1:2022.03.31.22273242. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.31.22273242. Update in: JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228885. PMID: 35411338; PMCID: PMC8996627.
Year of Medical School at Time of Visit
Sponsors
Dates of Travel
DOI
Permanent Link to this Item
PubMed ID
Other Identifiers
Notes
This article is a preprint. Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review.
Funding and Acknowledgements
Corresponding Author
Related Resources
Now published in JAMA Network Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28885