E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content
Cutrona, Sarah L ; Wagner, Joann L. ; Roblin, Douglas W. ; Gaglio, Bridget ; Williams, Andrew ; Torres Stone, Rosalie A. ; Mazor, Kathleen M.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Aged
Colonoscopy
Colorectal Neoplasms
*Electronic Mail
Female
Georgia
Hawaii
Health Promotion
Humans
Male
Massachusetts
Middle Aged
Peer Group
*Social Support
UMCCTS funding
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Health Communication
Health Information Technology
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
Effective techniques to encourage colorectal cancer screening in underscreened populations have included social support interventions and e-mail reminders from physicians. Personalized e-mail messages to promote colorectal cancer screening within social networks could be even more effective but have not been studied. The authors interviewed 387 e-mail users, aged 42-73 years in Georgia, Hawaii, and Massachusetts. Participants were asked to edit a sample message in which the sender shares a recent colonoscopy experience and urges the recipient to discuss colorectal cancer screening with a doctor. For those reporting willingness to send this message, changes to the message and suggested subject lines were recorded. Edited text was analyzed for content and concordance with original message. The majority of participants (74.4%) were willing to e-mail a modifiable message. Of those willing, 63.5% edited the message. Common edits included deletion (17.7%) or modification (17.4%) of a negatively framed sentence on colon cancer risks and addition or modification of personalizing words (15.6%). Few edits changed the meaning of the message (5.6%), and even fewer introduced factual inaccuracies (1.7%). Modifiable e-mail messages offer a way for screened individuals to promote colorectal cancer screening to social network members. The accuracy and effects of such messages should be further studied.
Source
J Health Commun. 2015;20(5):589-98. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012238. Epub 2015 Apr 3. Link to article on publisher's site