A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions
Saver, Barry G. ; Gustafson, David ; Taylor, Thomas R. ; Hawkins, Robert P. ; Woods, Nancy F. ; Dinauer, Susan ; Casey, Susan ; MacLaren-Loranger, Aileen
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Computer-Assisted Instruction
Conflict (Psychology)
*Decision Support Techniques
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Internet
Middle Aged
Pamphlets
Patient Education as Topic
*Patient Satisfaction
Perimenopause
Postmenopause
Questionnaires
Risk Assessment
Teaching Materials
Uncertainty
United States
Women
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Health Services Research
Primary Care
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Knowledge relevant to women's peri- and postmenopausal health decisions has been evolving rapidly. Web-based decision supports can be rapidly updated and have the potential to improve the quality of patients' decisions. We developed and tested a web-based decision support for peri- and postmenopausal health decisionmaking.
METHODS: We recruited 409 women aged 45-75 for one randomized, controlled trial and 54 women with an upcoming clinic appointment for a subsequent trial. Women were randomized to use the web-based decision support versus a printed brochure (first trial) and usual care (second trial). Outcomes were changes in decisional satisfaction, decisional conflict, and knowledge, both within each trial and compared across the trials.
RESULTS: Intervention subjects had greater increases in decisional satisfaction in the second trial and knowledge in both trials. A high dropout rate among women randomized to the website in the first trial effectively negated benefits in that trial, but not in the second.
CONCLUSIONS: The utility of this web-based decision support in two trials depended on a number of factors that appear related to the urgency of making a decision.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Decision aids should be targeted to patients actively trying to make a decision.
Source
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 May;66(2):211-22. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Link to article on publisher's site