A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults
Roditi, Rachel E. ; Poissant, Sarah F. ; Bero, Eva M. ; Lee, Daniel J.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Female
Hearing Loss
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Persons With Hearing Impairments
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
Speech
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Female
Hearing Loss
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models
Statistical
Persons With Hearing Impairments
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
Speech
Otolaryngology
Speech and Hearing Science
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictive model of cochlear implant (CI) performance in postlingually deafened adults that includes contemporary speech perception testing and the hearing history of both ears.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. Multivariate predictors of speech perception after CI surgery included duration of any degree of hearing loss (HL), duration of severe-to-profound HL, age at implantation, and preoperative Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet and HINT sentences in noise scores. Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) scores served as the dependent variable. To develop the model, we performed a stepwise multiple regression analysis.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Adult patients with postlingual severe-to-profound HL who received a multichannel CI. Mean follow-up was 28 months. Fifty-five patients were included in the initial bivariate analysis.
INTERVENTION(S): Multichannel cochlear implantation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Predicted and measured postoperative CNC scores.
RESULTS: The regression analysis resulted in a model that accounted for 60% of the variance in postoperative CNC scores. The formula is (pred)CNC score = 76.05 + (-0.08 x DurHL(CI ear)) + (0.38 x pre-HINT sentences in quiet) + (0.04 x long sev-prof HL(either ear)). Duration of HL was in months. The mean difference between predicted and measured postoperative CNC scores was 1.7 percentage points (SD, 16.3).
CONCLUSION: The University of Massachusetts CI formula uses HINT sentence scores and the hearing history of both ears to predict the variance in postoperative monosyllabic word scores. This model compares favorably with previous studies that relied on Central Institute for the Deaf sentence scores and uses patient data collected by most centers in the United States.
Source
Roditi RE, Poissant SF, Bero EM, Lee DJ. A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jun;30(4):449-54. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819d3480. PubMed PMID: 19415041.
Year of Medical School at Time of Visit
Sponsors
Dates of Travel
DOI
Permanent Link to this Item
PubMed ID
Other Identifiers
Notes
Rachel Roditi participated in this study as a medical student as part of the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.