Against the grain? A reasoned argument for not closing a state hospital
Geller, Jeffrey L. ; Shore, Helen ; Grudzinskas, Albert J. Jr. ; Appelbaum, Paul S.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
Financing, Government
Forecasting
Health Facility Closure
Hospital Bed Capacity
Hospitals, Psychiatric
Hospitals, State
Humans
Long-Term Care
Massachusetts
Medicaid
Public Sector
Reimbursement Mechanisms
Health Services Research
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatric and Mental Health
Psychiatry
Psychiatry and Psychology
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
In the face of the Massachusetts Governor's attempts to close one of the state's four remaining state hospitals, Massachusetts legislators overrode the Governor's veto of funding for the hospital, but required the state's Mental Health Authority to author a study of the implications of further loss of public sector inpatient beds. The Center for Mental Health Services Research of the University of Massachusetts Medical School conducted its own study concluding that maintaining a longer-term inpatient capacity in the public sector in central Massachusetts was both necessary and accrued a significant number of benefits. This article can serve as a model for the reasoned position that a state hospital in 21st century psychiatry can be looked at as a multiservice center that fulfills a key role in a public sector, integrated system of treatment, care, training and research.
Source
Psychiatr Q. 2005 Summer;76(2):177-94.