Publication

How many therapists? Practical guidance on investigating therapist effects in randomized controlled trials for eating disorders

Thompson, Doug
Cachelin, Fary
Striegel-Moore, Ruth H.
Barton, Bruce A
Shea, Munyi
Wilson, G. Terence
Embargo Expiration Date
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An important question in implementation/dissemination research is whether the efficacy of a given treatment varies in part based on the therapist delivering the treatment. This study sought to provide practical guidance to researchers in the field of eating disorders for building measurement of therapist effects into the design of a typical, relatively small randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHOD: Using assumptions based on past trials of eating disorder treatments, Monte Carlo simulations were used to examine 12 different scenarios based on crossing the number of therapists (between two and five) and the estimated therapist effect size (small, medium, and large). Patient sample size and study design were held constant.

RESULTS: There was reasonable power (>/=70%) to detect the therapist effect with three or four therapists and a large effect size.

DISCUSSION: Several practical implications for testing therapist effects in RCT are discussed. (c) 2012 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2012.

Source

Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Jul;45(5):670-6. doi: 10.1002/eat.22009. Epub 2012 Mar 12. Link to article on publisher's site

Year of Medical School at Time of Visit
Sponsors
Dates of Travel
DOI
10.1002/eat.22009
PubMed ID
Other Identifiers
Notes
Funding and Acknowledgements
Corresponding Author
Related Resources
Related Resources
Repository Citation
Rights
Distribution License