A clock shock: mouse CLOCK is not required for circadian oscillator function
DeBruyne, Jason P. ; Noton, Elizabeth ; Lambert, Christopher M. ; Maywood, Elizabeth S. ; Weaver, David R. ; Reppert, Steven M.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Animals
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
Biological Clocks
CLOCK Proteins
Circadian Rhythm
Dimerization
Feedback, Physiological
Light
Liver
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Knockout
Mice, Transgenic
Motor Activity
Phenotype
Photic Stimulation
RNA, Messenger
Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Trans-Activators
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Subject Area
Collections
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
The circadian clock mechanism in the mouse is composed of interlocking transcriptional feedback loops. Two transcription factors, CLOCK and BMAL1, are believed to be essential components of the circadian clock. We have used the Cre-LoxP system to generate whole-animal knockouts of CLOCK and evaluated the resultant circadian phenotypes. Surprisingly, CLOCK-deficient mice continue to express robust circadian rhythms in locomotor activity, although they do have altered responses to light. At the molecular and biochemical levels, clock gene mRNA and protein levels in both the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and a peripheral clock in the liver show alterations in the CLOCK-deficient animals, although the molecular feedback loops continue to function. Our data challenge a central feature of the current mammalian circadian clock model regarding the necessity of CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimers for clock function.
Source
Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):465-77. Link to article on publisher's site