Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial
D'Orsi, Carl J. ; Getty, David J. ; Pickett, Ronald M. ; Sechopoulos, Ioannis ; Newell, Mary S. ; Gundry, Kathleen R. ; Bates, Sandra R. ; Nishikawa, Robert M. ; Sickles, Edward A. ; Karellas, Andrew ... show 1 more
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Georgia
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Mammography
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Clinical Trials
Diagnosis
Investigative Techniques
Radiology
Subject Area
Collections
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare stereoscopic digital mammography (DM) with standard DM for the rate of patient recall and the detection of cancer in a screening population at elevated risk for breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Starting in September 2004 and ending in December 2007, this prospective HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved screening trial, with written informed consent, recruited female patients at elevated risk for breast cancer (eg, personal history of breast cancer or breast cancer in a close relative). A total of 1298 examinations from 779 patients (mean age, 58.6 years; range, 32-91 years) comprised the analyzable data set. A paired study design was used, with each enrolled patient serving as her own control. Patients underwent both DM and stereoscopic DM examinations in a single visit, findings of which were interpreted independently by two experienced radiologists, each using a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment (BI-RADS category 0, 1, or 2). All patients determined to have one or more findings with either or both modalities were recalled for standard diagnostic evaluation. The results of 1-year follow-up or biopsy were used to determine case truth.
RESULTS: Compared with DM, stereoscopic DM showed significantly higher specificity (91.2% [1167 of 1279] vs 87.8% [1123 of 1279]; P = .0024) and accuracy (90.9% [1180 of 1298] vs 87.4% [1135 of 1298]; P = .0023) for detection of cancer. Sensitivity for detection of cancer was not significantly different for stereoscopic DM (68.4% [13 of 19]) compared with DM (63.2% [12 of 19], P .99). The recall rate for stereoscopic DM was 9.6% (125 of 1298) and that for DM was 12.9% (168 of 1298) (P = .0018).
CONCLUSION: Compared with DM, stereoscopic DM significantly improved specificity for detection of cancer, while maintaining comparable sensitivity. The recall rate was significantly reduced with stereoscopic DM compared with DM.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120382/-/DC1.
Source
Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):81-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120382. Epub 2012 Nov 13. Link to article on publisher's site