Use of computed tomography to predict failure of nonoperative treatment of unilateral facet fractures of the cervical spine
Spector, Leo R. ; Kim, David H. ; Affonso, Jesse ; Albert, Todd J. ; Hilibrand, Alan S. ; Vaccaro, Alexander R.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anthropometry
Case Management
Cervical Vertebrae
Cohort Studies
Disease Progression
Dislocations
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Radiculopathy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Spinal Fractures
*Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Failure
Life Sciences
Medicine and Health Sciences
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether radiographic measurements derived from standard computed tomography (CT) evaluation can be used to predict failure of nonoperative treatment in patients with unilateral facet fractures.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no consensus regarding treatment of unilateral cervical spine facet fractures. Management of this injury is based primarily on the presence of neurologic deficits and the degree of perceived spinal instability. CT-based criteria for predicting failure of nonoperative treatment in this patient population have not been examined.
METHODS: Initial CT scans of all patients with unilateral cervical facet fractures were reviewed. Direct measurements included height and width of the facet fracture fragment, fracture displacement, and angulation. Calculated data included percent height and width of the fracture fragment based on the height and width of the contralateral intact facet.
RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with 26 unilateral facet fractures were identified. Five patients with 5 facet fractures failed nonoperative management and required delayed surgical stabilization. Comparing patients successfully treated nonoperatively to those failing nonoperative management, a significant difference was found in absolute height of the fracture fragment (P = 0.0002), articular fracture height (P = 0.008), and height of the fracture fragment expressed as a percentage of the contralateral intact lateral mass (P = 0.026).
CONCLUSION: The only significant risk factors identified for failure of nonoperative treatment were craniocaudal height of the fracture fragment and relative height of the fracture fragment expressed as a percentage of the intact lateral mass. This study suggests that patients with unilateral cervical facet fractures involving >40% of the absolute height of the intact lateral mass or an absolute height >1 cm are at increased risk for failure of nonoperative treatment. Failure of nonoperative treatment was not observed in any patient with a fracture involving less than 40% of the height of the lateral mass or an absolute height <1>cm.
Source
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2827-35. Link to article on publisher's site
Year of Medical School at Time of Visit
Sponsors
Dates of Travel
DOI
Permanent Link to this Item
PubMed ID
Other Identifiers
Notes
Medical student Jesse Afonso participated in this study as part of the Senior Scholars research program.