The Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression with Venlafaxine for Two Years (PREVENT) study: outcomes from the acute and continuation phases
Keller, Martin B. ; Trivedi, Madhukar H. ; Thase, Michael E. ; Shelton, Richard C. ; Kornstein, Susan G. ; Nemeroff, Charles B. ; Friedman, Edward S. ; Gelenberg, Alan J. ; Kocsis, James H. ; Dunner, David L. ... show 10 more
Citations
Authors
Trivedi, Madhukar H.
Thase, Michael E.
Shelton, Richard C.
Kornstein, Susan G.
Nemeroff, Charles B.
Friedman, Edward S.
Gelenberg, Alan J.
Kocsis, James H.
Dunner, David L.
Dunlop, Boadie W.
Hirschfeld, Robert M.
Rothschild, Anthony J.
Ferguson, James M.
Schatzberg, Alan F.
Zajecka, John M.
Pedersen, Ronald D.
Yan, Bing
Ahmed, Saeeduddin
Schmidt, Michael
Ninan, Philip T.
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
Cyclohexanols
Depression
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Evaluation
Female
Fluoxetine
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
*Treatment Outcome
Psychiatry
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of venlafaxine extended release (ER) and fluoxetine in the acute and continuation phases of treatment.
METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind study, outpatients with recurrent unipolar major depression were randomly assigned to receive venlafaxine ER (75-300 mg/day; n = 821) or fluoxetine (20-60 mg/day; n = 275). After a 10-week acute treatment phase, responders entered a 6-month continuation phase of ongoing therapy with double-blind venlafaxine ER (n = 530) or fluoxetine (n = 185). In the acute phase, the primary outcome was response, defined as a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score < or =12 or > or =50% decrease from baseline; the secondary outcome was remission, defined as a HDRS score < or =7. In the continuation phase, the primary outcome was the proportion of patients who sustained response or remission. Secondary measures included time to onset of sustained response or remission (i.e., meeting criteria at two or more consecutive visits), relapse rates, and quality-of-life measures.
RESULTS: At the acute treatment phase end point, response rates were 79% for both venlafaxine ER and fluoxetine; remission rates were 49% and 50% for venlafaxine ER and fluoxetine, respectively. In the continuation phase, response rates were 90% and 92%, and remission rates were 72% and 69% for venlafaxine ER and fluoxetine, respectively. Rates of sustained remission at the end of the continuation phase were 52% and 58% for venlafaxine ER and fluoxetine, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine ER and fluoxetine were comparably effective during both acute and continuation phase therapy.
Source
Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 15;62(12):1371-9. Epub 2007 Sep 7. Link to article on publisher's site