Improving ambulatory prescribing safety with a handheld decision support system: a randomized controlled trial
Berner, Eta S. ; Houston, Thomas K. ; Ray, Midge N. ; Allison, Jeroan J. ; Heudebert, Gustavo R. ; Chatham, W. Winn ; Kennedy, John I. Jr. ; Glandon, Gerald L. ; Norton, Patricia A. ; Crawford, Myra A. ... show 1 more
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
*Computers, Handheld
*Decision Support Systems, Clinical
*Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Hospitals, University
Humans
Medication Errors
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
*Point-of-Care Systems
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Bioinformatics
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing safety in the outpatient setting.
DESIGN: The design was a randomized, controlled trial conducted in a university-based resident clinic. Internal medicine residents received a PDA-based CDSS suite. For intervention residents, the CDSS included a prediction rule for NSAID-related gastrointestinal risk assessment and treatment recommendations. Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray musculoskeletal symptoms presented to study physicians. Safety outcomes were assessed from the prescriptions given to the SPs. Each prescription was reviewed by a committee of clinicians blinded to participant, intervention group assignment, and baseline or follow-up status.
MEASUREMENTS: Prescriptions were judged as safe or unsafe. The main outcome measure was the differential change in unsafe prescribing of NSAIDs for the intervention versus the control group.
RESULTS: At baseline, the mean proportion of cases per physician with unsafe prescriptions for the two groups was similar (0.27 vs. 0.29, p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline performance, intervention participants prescribed more safely than controls after receiving the CDSS (0.23 vs. 0.45 [F = 4.24, p < 0.05]). With the CDSS, intervention participants documented more complete assessment of patient gastrointestinal risk from NSAIDs.
CONCLUSION: PARTICIPANTS provided with a PDA-based CDSS for NSAID prescribing made fewer unsafe treatment decisions than participants without the CDSS.
Source
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):171-9. Epub 2005 Dec 15. Link to article on publisher's site