Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Evaluation of an Intervention to Support Patient-Rheumatologist Conversations About Escalating Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Principle Study

Danila, Maria I
Chen, Lang
Ruderman, Eric M
Owensby, Justin K
O'Beirne, Ronan
Melnick, Joshua A
Harrold, Leslie R
Curtis, David
Nowell, W Benjamin
Curtis, Jeffrey R
Citations
Altmetric:
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2021-12-27
Keywords
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Abstract

Objective: This study's objective was to test whether an online video intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation improves willingness to change treatment in people living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: We conducted a controlled, randomized trial among patients with RA enrolled in ArthritisPower, a United States patient registry. We recruited participants by email and surveyed their assessment of disease activity (patient global), satisfaction with disease control (patient acceptable symptom state), attitudes about RA medications, decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale), and willingness to modify RA treatment (choice predisposition scale, higher scores are better) if or when recommended by their rheumatologist. Intervention groups watched educational videos relevant to a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy, whereas control groups viewed vaccination-related videos as an "attention control." We compared the between-group difference in patients' willingness to modify RA treatment (primary outcome) and difference in decisional conflict about changing RA treatment (secondary outcome) after watching the videos using t tests.

Results: Participants with self-reported RA (n = 208) were 90% White and 90% women, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50 (11) years, and 52% reported familiarity with the RA T2T strategy. We found a significant improvement in between-group difference in willingness to change RA treatment among intervention versus control participants (0.49 [95% confidence interval 0.09-0.88], P = 0.02). The effect size (Glass's delta) for the intervention was 0.48. Decisional conflict about treatment change decreased, but the between-group difference was not significant.

Conclusion: This novel educational patient-directed intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation was associated with improved willingness to change RA treatment if or when recommended by a rheumatologist. Further studies should evaluate whether this change in patients' predisposition translates into actual treatment escalation.

Source

Danila MI, Chen L, Ruderman EM, Owensby JK, O'Beirne R, Melnick JA, Harrold LR, Curtis D, Nowell WB, Curtis JR. Evaluation of an Intervention to Support Patient-Rheumatologist Conversations About Escalating Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Principle Study. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;4(4):279-287. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11393. Epub 2021 Dec 27. PMID: 34962093; PMCID: PMC8992469.

Year of Medical School at Time of Visit
Sponsors
Dates of Travel
DOI
10.1002/acr2.11393
PubMed ID
34962093
Other Identifiers
Notes
Funding and Acknowledgements
Corresponding Author
Related Resources
Related Resources
Repository Citation
Rights
© 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International