Patient complexity and diabetes quality of care in rural settings
Salanitro, Amanda H. ; Safford, Monika M. ; Houston, Thomas K. ; Williams, Jessica H. ; Ovalle, Fernando ; Payne-Foster, Pamela ; Allison, Jeroan J. ; Estrada, Carlos A.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Aged
Alabama
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Diabetes Mellitus
Female
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
Insulin
Male
Middle Aged
Physician's Practice Patterns
Primary Health Care
*Quality of Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Factors
Rural Health Services
Rural Population
United States
UMCCTS funding
Biostatistics
Endocrine System Diseases
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
PURPOSE: Even though pay-for-performance programs are being rapidly implemented, little is known about how patient complexity affects practice-level performance assessment in rural settings. We sought to determine the association between patient complexity and practice-level performance in the rural United States.
BASIC PROCEDURES: Using baseline data from a trial aimed at improving diabetes care, we determined factors associated with a practice's proportion of patients having controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c
MAIN FINDINGS: Rural primary care practices (n=135) in 11 southeastern states provided information for 1641 patients with diabetes. For practices in the best quartile of observed control, 76.1% of patients had controlled diabetes vs 19.3% of patients in the worst quartile. After controlling for other variables, proportions of diabetes control were 10% lower in those practices whose patients had the greatest difficulty with either self testing or appointment keeping (p
PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: Basing public reporting and resource allocation on quality assessment that does not account for patient characteristics may further harm this vulnerable group of patients and physicians.
Source
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;103(3):234-40.