Accessibility of addiction treatment: results from a national survey of outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations
Friendmann, Peter D. ; Lemon, Stephenie C ; Stein, Michael D. ; D'Aunno, Thomas A.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Health Services Accessibility
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Logistic Models
Managed Care Programs
Medically Uninsured
Poverty
Refusal to Treat
Substance Abuse Treatment Centers
administration
Substance-Related Disorders
Uncompensated Care
United States
Waiting Lists
Behavioral Disciplines and Activities
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Preventive Medicine
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined organization-level characteristics associated with the accessibility of outpatient addiction treatment.
METHODS: Program directors and clinical supervisors from a nationally representative panel of outpatient substance abuse treatment units in the United States were surveyed in 1990, 1995, and 2000. Accessibility was measured from clinical supervisors' reports of whether the treatment organization provided "treatment on demand" (an average wait time of 48 hours or less for treatment entry), and of whether the program turned away any patients.
RESULTS: In multivariable logistic models, provision of "treatment on demand" increased two-fold from 1990 to 2000 (OR, 1.95; 95 percent CI, 1.5 to 2.6), while reports of turning patients away decreased nonsignificantly. Private for-profit units were twice as likely to provide "treatment on demand" (OR, 2.2; 95 percent CI, 1.3 to 3.6), but seven times more likely to turn patients away (OR, 7.4; 95 percent CI, 3.2 to 17.5) than public programs. Conversely, units that served more indigent populations were less likely to provide "treatment on demand" or to turn patients away. Methadone maintenance programs were also less likely to offer "treatment on demand" (OR, .65; 95 percent CI, .42 to .99), but more likely to turn patients away (OR, 2.4; 95 percent CI, 1.4 to 4.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the provision of timely addiction treatment appears to have increased throughout the 1990s, accessibility problems persist in programs that care for indigent patients and in methadone maintenance programs.
Source
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):887-903. Link to article on publisher's website