The new research ethic: will oversight requirements sink forensic research
Candilis, Philip J. ; Arikan, Rasim ; Noone, Sheila B. ; Holzer, Jacob C.
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Costs and Cost Analysis
Ethics Committees, Research
*Ethics, Research
Forensic Psychiatry
Government Regulation
Guideline Adherence
Human Experimentation
Humans
United States
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Health Services Research
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatry
Psychiatry and Psychology
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
The conduct of research with human participants is facing increased scrutiny from government, media, and academic sources. Research oversight is consequently increasing dramatically as education and accreditation movements gain momentum. Institutional review boards themselves are undergoing significant changes in organization and accountability, implementing new tools to monitor investigator compliance. This article describes the causes of recent calls for increased scrutiny, the resultant trends in research oversight, and the general lack of preparation for increased costs in the public sector. These are costs that will be felt acutely in the forensic setting as diminishing state budgets affect hospitals, universities, and correctional institutions.
Source
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):361-7. Link to article on publisher's website