Patients with chest pain calling 9-1-1 or self-transporting to reach definitive care: which mode is quicker
Hutchings, Caroline B. ; Mann, N.Clay ; Daya, Mohamud ; Jui, Jon ; Goldberg, Robert J. ; Cooper, Lawton ; Goff, David C. ; Cornell, Carol
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Algorithms
Analysis of Variance
Chest Pain
Cohort Studies
Decision Making
Demography
Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems
Emergency Medical Services
Health Services Research
Humans
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Retrospective Studies
*Thrombolytic Therapy
Time and Motion Studies
Transportation
Transportation of Patients
Biostatistics
Cardiovascular Diseases
Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Subject Area
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined differences in transport times for patients with chest pain who used private transportation compared with patients who used emergency medical services (EMS) to reach definitive medical care.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with data used from the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) trial conducted in 20 US cities. Elapsed time to care was examined through the use of (1) decision to seek care to initial care (emergency department [ED] arrival versus EMS arrival on scene [n=1209]); (2) decision to ED arrival (for both groups [n=2388]); (3) time to thrombolytic therapy once admitted to the ED (for both groups [n=309]); and (4) decision to seek care to thrombolytic therapy (n=276). Elapsed travel times were ranked within Zip Codes and submitted to a nested analysis of variance model to determine if elapsed times were different between modes of transport.
RESULTS: Private transportation (35 minutes) resulted in faster ED arrival than using EMS (39 minutes, P =.0014). However, if one considers EMS treatment to be initial care, calling 9-1-1 (6 minutes) resulted in much quicker care than patients using private transportation to the ED (32 minutes, P <.001). Transport by EMS resulted in a shorter elapsed time to thrombolytic administration compared with patients using private transportation when considering ED "door-to-needle" time (32 vs 49 minutes, respectively [P <.001]) or time from decision to seek care until administration of thrombolytic therapy (75 vs 92 minutes, respectively, [P =.042]).
CONCLUSIONS: Although private transportation results in a faster trip to the ED, quicker care is obtained with the use of EMS.
Source
Am Heart J. 2004 Jan;147(1):35-41.