Treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in relation to initial diagnostic impressions (insights from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events [CANRACE])
Bajaj, Ravi R. ; Goodman, Shaun G. ; Yan, Raymond T. ; Bagnall, Alan J. ; Gyenes, Gabor ; Welsh, Robert C. ; Eagle, Kim A. ; Brieger, David ; Ramanathan, Krishnan ; Grondin, Francois R. ... show 1 more
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
UMass Chan Affiliations
Document Type
Publication Date
Keywords
Aged
Canada
*Electrocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
*Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
*Registries
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Health Services Research
Subject Area
Collections
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
The early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains challenging, and a considerable proportion of patients are diagnosed with "possible" ACS on admission. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)) and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) enrolled 16,618 Canadian patients with suspected ACS in 1999 to 2008. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics, use of cardiac procedures, prognostic accuracy of the GRACE risk score, and in-hospital outcomes between patients given an admission diagnosis of "definite" versus "possible" ACS by the treating physician. Overall, 11,152 and 5,466 patients were given an initial diagnosis of "definite" ACS and "possible" ACS, respectively. Patients with a "possible" ACS had higher GRACE risk score (median 130 vs 125) and less frequently received aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, or beta blockers within the first 24 hours of presentation and assessment of left ventricular function, stress testing, cardiac catheterization, and percutaneous coronary intervention (all p <0.05). Patients with "possible" ACS had greater rates of in-hospital myocardial infarction (9.0% vs 2.0%, p <0.05) and heart failure (12% vs 8.9%, p <0.05). The GRACE risk score demonstrated excellent discrimination for in-hospital mortality in both groups and for the entire study population. In conclusion, compared to patients with "definite" ACS on presentation, those with "possible" ACS had higher baseline GRACE risk scores but less frequently received evidence-based medical therapies within 24 hours of admission or underwent cardiac procedures during hospitalization. The GRACE risk score provided accurate risk assessment, regardless of the initial diagnostic impression.
Source
Bajaj RR, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Bagnall AJ, Gyenes G, Welsh RC, Eagle KA, Brieger D, Ramanathan K, Grondin FR, Yan AT; Canadian GRACE and CANRACE Investigators. Treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in relation to initial diagnostic impressions (insights from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events [CANRACE]). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;111(2):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.018. Link to article on publisher's site