Broadly-recognized, cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 CD4 T cell epitopes are highly conserved across human coronaviruses and presented by common HLA alleles [preprint]
Becerra-Artiles, Aniuska ; Calvo-Calle, J Mauricio ; Co, Mary Dawn T. ; Nanaware, Padma P. ; Cruz, John ; Weaver, Grant ; Lu, Liying ; Forconi, Catherine S ; Finberg, Robert W. ; Moormann, Ann M. ... show 1 more
Citations
Student Authors
Faculty Advisor
Academic Program
Document Type
Publication Date
Subject Area
Files
Embargo Expiration Date
Link to Full Text
Abstract
Sequence homology between SARS-CoV-2 and common-cold human coronaviruses (HCoVs) raises the possibility that memory responses to prior HCoV infection can impact the T cell response in COVID-19. We studied T cells recognizing SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs in convalescent COVID-19 donors, and identified a highly conserved SARS-CoV-2 sequence S811-831, with two overlapping epitopes presented by common MHC-II proteins HLA-DQ5 and HLA-DP4. These epitopes were recognized by CD4+ T cells from convalescent COVID-19 donors, mRNA vaccine recipients, and by low-abundance CD4+ T cells in uninfected donors. TCR sequencing revealed a diverse repertoire with public TCRs. CD4+ T cell cross-reactivity was driven by the remarkably strong conservation of T cell contact residues in both HLA-DQ5 and HLA-DP4 binding frames, with distinct patterns of HCoV cross-reactivity explained by MHC-II binding preferences and substitutions at secondary TCR contact sites. These data highlight S811-831 as a highly-conserved CD4+ T cell epitope broadly recognized across human populations.
Source
bioRxiv 2022.01.20.477107; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477107. Link to preprint on bioRxiv.
Year of Medical School at Time of Visit
Sponsors
Dates of Travel
DOI
Permanent Link to this Item
PubMed ID
Other Identifiers
Notes
This article is a preprint. Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review.
Funding and Acknowledgements
Corresponding Author
Related Resources
Now published in Cell Reports doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110952