The epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus transmission in the anesthesia work area
Authors
Loftus, Randy W.Koff, Matthew D.
Brown, Jeremiah R.
Patel, Hetal M.
Jensen, Jens T.
Reddy, Sundara
Ruoff, Kathryn L.
Heard, Stephen O.
Yeager, Mark P.
Dodds, Thomas M.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of AnesthesiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2015-04-01Keywords
AdultAged
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Cross Infection
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
Equipment Contamination
Female
Humans
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Operating Rooms
Phenotype
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Skin
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcus aureus
Time Factors
Anesthesiology
Clinical Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the epidemiology of intraoperative Staphylococcus aureus transmission. The primary aim of this study was to examine the mode of transmission, reservoir of origin, transmission locations, and antibiotic susceptibility for frequently encountered S aureus strains (phenotypes) in the anesthesia work area. Our secondary aims were to examine phenotypic associations with 30-day postoperative patient cultures, phenotypic growth rates, and risk factors for phenotypic isolation. METHODS: S aureus isolates previously identified as possible intraoperative bacterial transmission events by class of pathogen, temporal association, and analytical profile indexing were subjected to antibiotic disk diffusion sensitivity. The combination of these techniques was then used to confirm S aureus transmission events and to classify them as occurring within or between operative cases (mode). The origin of S aureus transmission events was determined via use of a previously validated experimental model and links to 30-day postoperative patient cultures confirmed via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Growth rates were assessed via time-to-positivity analysis, and risk factors for isolation were characterized via logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred seventy S aureus isolates previously implicated as possible intraoperative transmission events were further subdivided by analytical profile indexing phenotype. Two phenotypes, phenotype P (patients) and phenotype H (hands), accounted for 65% of isolates. Phenotype P and phenotype H contributed to at least 1 confirmed transmission event in 39% and 28% of cases, respectively. Patient skin surfaces (odds ratio [OR], 8.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-30.73) and environmental (OR, 10.89; 95% CI, 1.29-92.13) samples were more likely than provider hands (referent) to have phenotype P positivity. Phenotype P was more likely than phenotype H to be resistant to methicillin (OR, 4.38; 95% CI, 1.59-12.06; P = 0.004) and to be linked to 30-day postoperative patient cultures (risk ratio, 36.63 [risk difference, 0.174; 95% CI, 0.019-0.328]; P < 0.001). Phenotype P exhibited a faster growth rate for methicillin resistant and for methicillin susceptible than phenotype H (phenotype P: median, 10.32H; interquartile range, 10.08-10.56; phenotype H: median, 10.56H; interquartile range, 10.32-10.8; P = 0.012). Risk factors for isolation of phenotype P included age (OR, 14.11; 95% CI, 3.12-63.5; P = 0.001) and patient exposure to the hospital ward (OR, 41.11; 95% CI, 5.30-318.78; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Two S aureus phenotypes are frequently transmitted in the anesthesia work area. A patient and environmentally derived phenotype is associated with increased risk of antibiotic resistance and links to 30-day postoperative patient cultures as compared with a provider hand-derived phenotype. Future work should be directed toward improved screening and decolonization of patients entering the perioperative arena and improved intraoperative environmental cleaning to attenuate postoperative health care-associated infections.Source
Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):807-18. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a8c16a. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a8c16aPermanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/25759PubMed ID
24937345Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a8c16a