Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of AnesthesiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
1993-07-01Keywords
Anesthesia, CaudalAnesthesia, Conduction
Anesthesia, Epidural
Anesthesia, Spinal
Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Infant
Anesthesiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Regional anesthetic techniques for children have recently enjoyed a justified resurgence in popularity. Intraoperative blockade of the neuraxis, whether by the spinal or epidural route, provides excellent analgesia with minimal physiologic alteration and, with an indwelling catheter, can provide continuous pain relief for many days postoperatively. As a supplement to general anesthesia, local anesthetic blockade of the neuraxis decreases the total amount of general anesthetic required for surgery, hastens emergence, and allows for a better postoperative experience by providing a pain-free emergence from general anesthesia. Although some practitioners contend that a regional block on an already anesthetized child adds to the risk of the general anesthetic itself, in experienced hands the risks are negligible and the benefits dramatic. In this review of caudal and lumbar epidural and subarachnoid blockade in infants and children, anatomy, physiologic alterations, and pharmacology pertinent to the three types of neuraxial blockade are described, with the aim of providing the practicing anesthesiologist with the foundation needed to perform these blocks with relative confidence.Source
J Clin Anesth. 1993 Jul-Aug;5(4):342-54. DOI 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90131-WDOI
10.1016/0952-8180(93)90131-WPermanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/25804PubMed ID
8373616Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/0952-8180(93)90131-W