Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiao-Ou
dc.contributor.authorFu, Yu
dc.contributor.authorMou, Haiwei
dc.contributor.authorXue, Wen
dc.contributor.authorWeng, Zhiping
dc.date2022-08-11T08:07:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:37:59Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-27
dc.date.submitted2018-09-14
dc.identifier.citation<p>PLoS Genet. 2018 Aug 27;14(8):e1007579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007579.eCollection 2018 Aug. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007579">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1553-7390 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pgen.1007579
dc.identifier.pmid30148885
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/25841
dc.description.abstractRecursive splicing (RS) is an evolutionarily conserved process of removing long introns via multiple steps of splicing. It was first discovered in Drosophila and recently proven to occur also in humans. The detailed mechanism of recursive splicing is not well understood, in particular, whether it is kinetically coupled with transcription. To investigate the dynamic process that underlies recursive splicing, we systematically characterized 342 RS sites in three human cell types using published time-series data that monitored synchronized Pol II elongation and nascent RNA production with 4-thiouridine labeling. We found that half of the RS events occurred post-transcriptionally with long delays. For at least 18-47% RS introns, we detected RS junction reads only after detecting canonical splicing junction reads, supporting the notion that these introns were removed by both recursive splicing and canonical splicing. Furthermore, the choice of which splicing mechanism was used showed cell type specificity. Our results suggest that recursive splicing supplements, rather than replaces, canonical splicing for removing long introns.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30148885&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectIntrons
dc.subjectRNA sequencing
dc.subjectSequence motif analysis
dc.subjectRNA splicing
dc.subjectDNA transcription
dc.subjectNeurons
dc.subjectExon mapping
dc.subjectSequence alignment
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectCell and Developmental Biology
dc.subjectComputational Biology
dc.subjectGenetics and Genomics
dc.titleThe temporal landscape of recursive splicing during Pol II transcription elongation in human cells
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePLoS genetics
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&amp;context=bioinformatics_pubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/bioinformatics_pubs/132
dc.identifier.contextkey12841788
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:37:59Z
html.description.abstract<p>Recursive splicing (RS) is an evolutionarily conserved process of removing long introns via multiple steps of splicing. It was first discovered in Drosophila and recently proven to occur also in humans. The detailed mechanism of recursive splicing is not well understood, in particular, whether it is kinetically coupled with transcription. To investigate the dynamic process that underlies recursive splicing, we systematically characterized 342 RS sites in three human cell types using published time-series data that monitored synchronized Pol II elongation and nascent RNA production with 4-thiouridine labeling. We found that half of the RS events occurred post-transcriptionally with long delays. For at least 18-47% RS introns, we detected RS junction reads only after detecting canonical splicing junction reads, supporting the notion that these introns were removed by both recursive splicing and canonical splicing. Furthermore, the choice of which splicing mechanism was used showed cell type specificity. Our results suggest that recursive splicing supplements, rather than replaces, canonical splicing for removing long introns.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathbioinformatics_pubs/132
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Molecular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentRNA Therapeutics Institute
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology
dc.source.pagese1007579


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
journal.pgen.1007579_1_.pdf
Size:
8.290Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.