HIV-1 protease inhibitors from inverse design in the substrate envelope exhibit subnanomolar binding to drug-resistant variants
Authors
Altman, Michael D.Ali, Akbar
Reddy, G. S. Kiran Kumar
Nalam, Madhavi N. L.
Anjum, Saima G.
Cao, Hong
Chellappan, Sripriya
Kairys, Visvaldas
Fernandes, Miguel X.
Gilson, Michael K.
Schiffer, Celia A.
Rana, Tariq M.
Tidor, Bruce
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular PharmacologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-04-17Keywords
AlgorithmsCarbamates
Crystallography, X-Ray
Drug Design
Drug Resistance, Viral
HIV Protease
HIV Protease Inhibitors
HIV-1
Kinetics
Models, Molecular
Structure-Activity Relationship
Sulfonamides
Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Health
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The acquisition of drug-resistant mutations by infectious pathogens remains a pressing health concern, and the development of strategies to combat this threat is a priority. Here we have applied a general strategy, inverse design using the substrate envelope, to develop inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Structure-based computation was used to design inhibitors predicted to stay within a consensus substrate volume in the binding site. Two rounds of design, synthesis, experimental testing, and structural analysis were carried out, resulting in a total of 51 compounds. Improvements in design methodology led to a roughly 1000-fold affinity enhancement to a wild-type protease for the best binders, from a Ki of 30-50 nM in round one to below 100 pM in round two. Crystal structures of a subset of complexes revealed a binding mode similar to each design that respected the substrate envelope in nearly all cases. All four best binders from round one exhibited broad specificity against a clinically relevant panel of drug-resistant HIV-1 protease variants, losing no more than 6-13-fold affinity relative to wild type. Testing a subset of second-round compounds against the panel of resistant variants revealed three classes of inhibitors: robust binders (maximum affinity loss of 14-16-fold), moderate binders (35-80-fold), and susceptible binders (greater than 100-fold). Although for especially high-affinity inhibitors additional factors may also be important, overall, these results suggest that designing inhibitors using the substrate envelope may be a useful strategy in the development of therapeutics with low susceptibility to resistance.Source
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 May 14;130(19):6099-113. Epub 2008 Apr 16. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1021/ja076558pPermanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26130PubMed ID
18412349Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1021/ja076558p