Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAustin, John-Marc
dc.contributor.authorFoscolos, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorBennet, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.contributor.authorTrobaugh, Jules
dc.contributor.authorAustin, John-Marc
dc.contributor.authorFoscolos, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorBennet, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.contributor.authorTrobaugh, Jules
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:41:54Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:41:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-22
dc.date.submitted2019-03-25
dc.identifier.doi10.13028/gnpx-n983
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26741
dc.description.abstractBackground: Individuals who are LGBTQIA+ or gender nonconforming have specific health needs and face health disparities that are exacerbated by a lack of training and cultural sensitivity among health professionals. This study was initiated by a second year University of Massachusetts School of Medicine student in response to the lack of LGBTQIA+ health content in the first year Doctoring & Clinical Skills (DCS1) course. The DCS1 session on collecting a sexual history was selected as the primary focus for revision. Community-Based Participatory Research, because of its emphasis on joining with a community of interest as full and equal partners in all phases of the research process, served as an ideal model for the novel application to curriculum development to address this gap in training in undergraduate medical education. Methods: A sample of 13 LGBTQIA+ community members from Worcester were recruited to form a curriculum advisory committee. The committee convened for two focus-group style meetings where they reviewed the curriculum and had the opportunity to provide their feedback, which was used to rewrite the session. Additionally, the community members had the opportunity to participate in a storytelling video where they discussed their experiences in healthcare as LGBTQIA+ patients. A pre-test post-test design was used to survey the UMMS SOM students in order to evaluate the new version of the DCS1 session. Results: The percentage of M1 students reporting they had the necessary skills to treat LGBTQIA+ patients increased from pre-session to post-session (26.2% (n=130), 63.2% (n=76), p = < 0.001). Compared to current M2 students who completed the course last year (n=65), more MS1 students (n=76) rated the overall quality of the DCS1 session as excellent or good (23.1%, 77.6%, p= < 0.0001. Conclusion: CBPR serves as an efficacious model for the creation of curriculum inclusive of LGBTQIA+ health.
dc.formatflash_audio
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCopyright the Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
dc.subjectLGBTQIA+
dc.subjecthealth needs
dc.subjecthealth disparities
dc.subjecttraining
dc.subjectmedical education
dc.subjectDoctoring & Clinical Skills (DCS1) course
dc.subjectCivic and Community Engagement
dc.subjectCommunity-Based Research
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectGender and Sexuality
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.subjectTranslational Medical Research
dc.titleAddressing Bias in LGBTQIA+ Undergraduate Medical Education: An Innovative and Community Based Approach to Curriculum Reform
dc.typePoster
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1151&amp;context=chr_symposium&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/chr_symposium/2019/posters/6
dc.identifier.contextkey14099758
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-24T03:52:21Z
atmire.contributor.authoremailjules.trobaugh@umassmed.edu
html.description.abstract<p>Background: Individuals who are LGBTQIA+ or gender nonconforming have specific health needs and face health disparities that are exacerbated by a lack of training and cultural sensitivity among health professionals. This study was initiated by a second year University of Massachusetts School of Medicine student in response to the lack of LGBTQIA+ health content in the first year Doctoring & Clinical Skills (DCS1) course. The DCS1 session on collecting a sexual history was selected as the primary focus for revision. Community-Based Participatory Research, because of its emphasis on joining with a community of interest as full and equal partners in all phases of the research process, served as an ideal model for the novel application to curriculum development to address this gap in training in undergraduate medical education.</p> <p>Methods: A sample of 13 LGBTQIA+ community members from Worcester were recruited to form a curriculum advisory committee. The committee convened for two focus-group style meetings where they reviewed the curriculum and had the opportunity to provide their feedback, which was used to rewrite the session. Additionally, the community members had the opportunity to participate in a storytelling video where they discussed their experiences in healthcare as LGBTQIA+ patients. A pre-test post-test design was used to survey the UMMS SOM students in order to evaluate the new version of the DCS1 session.</p> <p>Results: The percentage of M1 students reporting they had the necessary skills to treat LGBTQIA+ patients increased from pre-session to post-session (26.2% (n=130), 63.2% (n=76), p = < 0.001). Compared to current M2 students who completed the course last year (n=65), more MS1 students (n=76) rated the overall quality of the DCS1 session as excellent or good (23.1%, 77.6%, p= < 0.0001.</p> <p>Conclusion: CBPR serves as an efficacious model for the creation of curriculum inclusive of LGBTQIA+ health.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathchr_symposium/2019/posters/6


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9___Poster_JM_Austin.pdf
Size:
421.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Poster

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright the Author(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright the Author(s)