Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPenwell-Waines, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorRunyan, Christine
dc.contributor.authorKolobova, Irina
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Julie
dc.contributor.authorBuck, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorSchneiderhan, Jill
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:42:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:42:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-02
dc.date.submitted2019-07-25
dc.identifier.citation<p>Fam Med. 2019 Jul 2. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425. <a href="https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0742-3225 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425
dc.identifier.pmid31269221
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26765
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Physician Wellness Task Force released a comprehensive Well-Being Action Plan as a guide to help programs create a culture of wellness. The plan, however, does not offer a recommendation as to which elements may be most important, least resource intensive, or most feasible. This study sought to identify the most essential components of the AFMRD's Well-Being Action Plan, as rated by expert panelists using a modified Delphi technique. METHODS: Sixty-eight selected experts were asked to participate; after three rounds of surveys, the final sample included 27 participants (7% residents, 38% MD faculty, 54% behavioral science faculty). RESULTS: Fourteen elements were rated as essential by at least 80% of the participants. These components included interventions at both the system and individual level. Of those elements ranked in the top five by a majority of the panel, all but one do not mention specific curricular content, but rather discusses the nature of a wellness curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus was that an essential curriculum should begin early, be longitudinal, identify a champion, and provide support for self-disclosure of struggles.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31269221&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425
dc.subjectfamily medicine
dc.subjectresidents
dc.subjectresidency
dc.subjectwellness
dc.subjectcurriculum
dc.subjectFamily Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Psychology
dc.subjectIntegrative Medicine
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleMaking Sense of Family Medicine Resident Wellness Curricula: A Delphi Study of Content Experts
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleFamily medicine
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cipc/104
dc.identifier.contextkey14995312
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Physician Wellness Task Force released a comprehensive Well-Being Action Plan as a guide to help programs create a culture of wellness. The plan, however, does not offer a recommendation as to which elements may be most important, least resource intensive, or most feasible. This study sought to identify the most essential components of the AFMRD's Well-Being Action Plan, as rated by expert panelists using a modified Delphi technique.</p> <p>METHODS: Sixty-eight selected experts were asked to participate; after three rounds of surveys, the final sample included 27 participants (7% residents, 38% MD faculty, 54% behavioral science faculty).</p> <p>RESULTS: Fourteen elements were rated as essential by at least 80% of the participants. These components included interventions at both the system and individual level. Of those elements ranked in the top five by a majority of the panel, all but one do not mention specific curricular content, but rather discusses the nature of a wellness curriculum.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus was that an essential curriculum should begin early, be longitudinal, identify a champion, and provide support for self-disclosure of struggles.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcipc/104
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Integrated Primary Care
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record