Making Sense of Family Medicine Resident Wellness Curricula: A Delphi Study of Content Experts
dc.contributor.author | Penwell-Waines, Lauren | |
dc.contributor.author | Runyan, Christine | |
dc.contributor.author | Kolobova, Irina | |
dc.contributor.author | Grace, Aaron | |
dc.contributor.author | Brennan, Julie | |
dc.contributor.author | Buck, Katherine | |
dc.contributor.author | Ross, Valerie | |
dc.contributor.author | Schneiderhan, Jill | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:08:05.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T15:42:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T15:42:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07-02 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | <p>Fam Med. 2019 Jul 2. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425. <a href="https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0742-3225 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31269221 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26765 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Physician Wellness Task Force released a comprehensive Well-Being Action Plan as a guide to help programs create a culture of wellness. The plan, however, does not offer a recommendation as to which elements may be most important, least resource intensive, or most feasible. This study sought to identify the most essential components of the AFMRD's Well-Being Action Plan, as rated by expert panelists using a modified Delphi technique. METHODS: Sixty-eight selected experts were asked to participate; after three rounds of surveys, the final sample included 27 participants (7% residents, 38% MD faculty, 54% behavioral science faculty). RESULTS: Fourteen elements were rated as essential by at least 80% of the participants. These components included interventions at both the system and individual level. Of those elements ranked in the top five by a majority of the panel, all but one do not mention specific curricular content, but rather discusses the nature of a wellness curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus was that an essential curriculum should begin early, be longitudinal, identify a champion, and provide support for self-disclosure of struggles. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31269221&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p> | |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.899425 | |
dc.subject | family medicine | |
dc.subject | residents | |
dc.subject | residency | |
dc.subject | wellness | |
dc.subject | curriculum | |
dc.subject | Family Medicine | |
dc.subject | Health Psychology | |
dc.subject | Integrative Medicine | |
dc.subject | Medical Education | |
dc.subject | Mental and Social Health | |
dc.subject | Primary Care | |
dc.subject | Psychiatry and Psychology | |
dc.title | Making Sense of Family Medicine Resident Wellness Curricula: A Delphi Study of Content Experts | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Family medicine | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cipc/104 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 14995312 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Physician Wellness Task Force released a comprehensive Well-Being Action Plan as a guide to help programs create a culture of wellness. The plan, however, does not offer a recommendation as to which elements may be most important, least resource intensive, or most feasible. This study sought to identify the most essential components of the AFMRD's Well-Being Action Plan, as rated by expert panelists using a modified Delphi technique.</p> <p>METHODS: Sixty-eight selected experts were asked to participate; after three rounds of surveys, the final sample included 27 participants (7% residents, 38% MD faculty, 54% behavioral science faculty).</p> <p>RESULTS: Fourteen elements were rated as essential by at least 80% of the participants. These components included interventions at both the system and individual level. Of those elements ranked in the top five by a majority of the panel, all but one do not mention specific curricular content, but rather discusses the nature of a wellness curriculum.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus was that an essential curriculum should begin early, be longitudinal, identify a champion, and provide support for self-disclosure of struggles.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | cipc/104 | |
dc.contributor.department | Center for Integrated Primary Care | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Family Medicine and Community Health |