Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Paula
dc.contributor.authorLestoquoy, Anna Sophia
dc.contributor.authorNegash, N. Lily
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Man
dc.contributor.authorGergen-Barnett, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorSaper, Robert
dc.contributor.authorPenti, Brian
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Laura F.
dc.contributor.authorLiebschutz, Jane M.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:42:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:42:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-06
dc.date.submitted2019-07-25
dc.identifier.citation<p>Explore (NY). 2019 May - Jun;15(3):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Mar 7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2019.01.003">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1550-8307 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.explore.2019.01.003
dc.identifier.pmid31056423
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26766
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Description of recruitment methods and lessons learned in a randomized controlled trial of underserved patients using an integrative medical group visits intervention. METHODS: Comparison of the demographic characteristics of participants screened and consented to the study as well as description of recruitment methods used. OUTCOME MEASURES: This paper examines the characteristics of patients who were eligible compared to those who were not, characteristics of patients at the different sites, and patient characteristics over time (by comparing various cohorts) based on our experiences recruiting underserved patients. RESULTS: We screened 338 patients, with 205 (60.6%) meeting eligibility criteria and 159 patients randomized and consented. 133 patients were found ineligible, with the most common reasons being low depression scores (n=20), manic symptoms (n=20), and psychotic symptoms (n=19), and alcohol use (n=15). We found demographic differences in patients recruited by different methods and at different sites- patients referred by provider letter were older than those referred by self-referral or provider referral (mean age/SD vs. mean age/SD, p=0.0001). For site-specific differences, patients at DH were older (53 SD=12.3) than those at the Boston Medical Center (49 SD=11.3) and CSHC (p=0.048) in pair-wise comparisons. Patients at DH were also more likely to be white (25%) as compared to BMC (18%) and DH (7%), while those at CSHC were more likely to be black (70%) (p=0.008).
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31056423&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2019.01.003
dc.subjectIntegrative medicine
dc.subjectRecruitment
dc.subjectUnderserved patients
dc.subjectChronic pain
dc.subjectBehavioral Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Psychology
dc.subjectIntegrative Medicine
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleLessons Learned and Strategies for Recruitment of Diverse, Low-income Patients into an Integrative Medical Group Visit Clinical Trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleExplore (New York, N.Y.)
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cipc/105
dc.identifier.contextkey14995316
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: Description of recruitment methods and lessons learned in a randomized controlled trial of underserved patients using an integrative medical group visits intervention.</p> <p>METHODS: Comparison of the demographic characteristics of participants screened and consented to the study as well as description of recruitment methods used.</p> <p>OUTCOME MEASURES: This paper examines the characteristics of patients who were eligible compared to those who were not, characteristics of patients at the different sites, and patient characteristics over time (by comparing various cohorts) based on our experiences recruiting underserved patients.</p> <p>RESULTS: We screened 338 patients, with 205 (60.6%) meeting eligibility criteria and 159 patients randomized and consented. 133 patients were found ineligible, with the most common reasons being low depression scores (n=20), manic symptoms (n=20), and psychotic symptoms (n=19), and alcohol use (n=15). We found demographic differences in patients recruited by different methods and at different sites- patients referred by provider letter were older than those referred by self-referral or provider referral (mean age/SD vs. mean age/SD, p=0.0001). For site-specific differences, patients at DH were older (53 SD=12.3) than those at the Boston Medical Center (49 SD=11.3) and CSHC (p=0.048) in pair-wise comparisons. Patients at DH were also more likely to be white (25%) as compared to BMC (18%) and DH (7%), while those at CSHC were more likely to be black (70%) (p=0.008).</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcipc/105
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Integrated Primary Care
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages215-221


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record