Assessing social determinants of health in primary care: Liability or opportunity
UMass Chan AffiliationsDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
Center for Integrated Primary Care
Health Services Administration
Health Services Research
Medicine and Health
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatry and Psychology
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractHealth care is never boring. It changes rapidly based on political winds, financial models, novel terminology, and biomedical advances. In the past decade, there has been large-scale implementation of integrated health care, routine screening for common behavioral health conditions, and the rollout of alternative payment models in primary care. However, even before these advances have been inculcated as the standard of care, we are now witnessing the implementation of health coaches and recommendations to screen for social determinants of health. Social determinants of health (SDOHs) include nonclinical factors that impact health, such as income, education, and the social the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age. While there is strong evidence that health outcomes are only marginally determined by direct clinical care and largely determined, it is unclear what "system of care" (public health vs. medical care) bears the responsibility of identifying and addressing these issues. Is this really the responsibility and role of primary care? Whether we as a health care system decide that systematically asking about and addressing SDOHs is within our job descriptions remains to be seen. Further research is needed to determine the cost and clinical impact of screening and addressing SDOHs.
Fam Syst Health. 2018 Dec;36(4):550-552. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000377. Link to article on publisher's site
Permanent Link to this Itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26800
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Making the Case for Sustainable Funding for Community Health Worker Services: Talking to Payers and ProvidersLondon, Katharine (2018-01-27)In this presentation, Katharine London of the Center for Health Law and Economics makes her case for offering sustainable funding for community health worker services. Research has shown community health workers can have a distinct impact on health systems, helping them improve population health and contain costs, while also promoting health equity and community engagement. This presentation was designed to assist CHWs and other advocates in engaging with policymakers and payers to support CHW sustainability and develop a financial plan for their CHW work. It was presented as part of a CHW Sustainability event held at the Families USA’s annual conference, Health Action 2018: Staying Strong for America’s Families, in Washington, DC. See Katharine London's blog post on payment delivery methods for community health workers here.
Policy Brief: Addressing Social Determinants of Health through Community Health Workers: A Call to ActionLondon, Katharine; Damio, Grace; Ferrazo, Meredith; Perez-Escamalla, Rafael; Wiggins, Noelle (2018-01-30)This technical report was compiled by the Hispanic Health Council in partnership with Southwestern AHEC and a panel of Community Health Worker Policy Research Experts which included our Katharine London from the Center for Health Law and Economics. The report offers a number of policy recommendations for community health workers for communities that might benefit from community-based services. The report offers recommendations on; payment of community health workers; community health worker caseloads; community health worker recruitment; community health worker training; reflective and trauma-informed mentoring and supportive supervision of community health workers; integration of community health workers into care teams; documenting the effect of community heal worker services on social determination of health. The Hispanic Health Council believes a service design that effectively supports community health workers would incorporate the seven areas of policy recommendation included in this report.
A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family MembersDelman, Jonathan (2006-01-01)During the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.