We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 11, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReiter, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorRunyan, Christine
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:42:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:42:15Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-01
dc.date.submitted2019-02-19
dc.identifier.citation<p>Fam Syst Health. 2013 Mar;31(1):20-7. doi: 10.1037/a0031855. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031855">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1091-7527 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/a0031855
dc.identifier.pmid23566124
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26804
dc.description.abstractPrimary care settings are particularly prone to complex relationships that can be ethically challenging. This is due in part to three of the distinctive attributes of primary care: a whole family orientation; team-based care; and a longitudinal care delivery model. In addition, the high patient volume of primary care means that the likelihood of encountering ethically challenging relationships is probably greater than in a specialty setting. This article argues that one ethical standard of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010, Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, www.apa.org/ethics/code) (10.02, Therapy Involving Couples or Families) should be revised to better accommodate the work of psychologists in primary care. The corresponding Principles of Medical Ethics from the American Medical Association (AMA, 2012, Code of medical ethics: Current opinions with annotations, 2012-2013, Washington, DC: Author), most notably the principle regarding a physician's duty to "respect the rights of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals as well as safeguard privacy" are also noted. In addition, the article details how the three attributes of primary care often result in complex relationships, and provides suggestions for handling such relationships ethically.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23566124&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://insights.ovid.com/famse/201303110/00124787-201303110-00003
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectrelationships
dc.subjectBehavioral Medicine
dc.subjectBioethics and Medical Ethics
dc.subjectHealth Psychology
dc.subjectIntegrative Medicine
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleThe ethics of complex relationships in primary care behavioral health
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleFamilies, systems and health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare
dc.source.volume31
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cipc/41
dc.identifier.contextkey13851653
html.description.abstract<p>Primary care settings are particularly prone to complex relationships that can be ethically challenging. This is due in part to three of the distinctive attributes of primary care: a whole family orientation; team-based care; and a longitudinal care delivery model. In addition, the high patient volume of primary care means that the likelihood of encountering ethically challenging relationships is probably greater than in a specialty setting. This article argues that one ethical standard of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010, Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, www.apa.org/ethics/code) (10.02, Therapy Involving Couples or Families) should be revised to better accommodate the work of psychologists in primary care. The corresponding Principles of Medical Ethics from the American Medical Association (AMA, 2012, Code of medical ethics: Current opinions with annotations, 2012-2013, Washington, DC: Author), most notably the principle regarding a physician's duty to "respect the rights of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals as well as safeguard privacy" are also noted. In addition, the article details how the three attributes of primary care often result in complex relationships, and provides suggestions for handling such relationships ethically.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcipc/41
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Integrated Primary Care
dc.source.pages20-7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record