Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Paula
dc.contributor.authorFilippelli, Amanda C.
dc.contributor.authorKabbara, Karim
dc.contributor.authorLin, Steven C.
dc.contributor.authorSadikova, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorKaptchuk, Ted J.
dc.contributor.authorKemper, Kathi
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:42:18Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:42:18Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-01
dc.date.submitted2019-02-20
dc.identifier.citation<p>J Altern Complement Med. 2015 Oct;21(10):638-44. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0156. Epub 2015 Aug 13. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2015.0156">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1075-5535 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/acm.2015.0156
dc.identifier.pmid26270001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26814
dc.description<p>At the time of publication, Paula Gardiner was not yet affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Medical School.</p>
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Little is known about the feasibility of online education in improving communication and documentation of dietary supplements (DS) among clinicians. METHODS: This prospective educational study included clinicians at an urban teaching hospital. The curriculum included video streams, didactics, and interactive case presentations to discuss (1) DS safety and effectiveness, (2) cultural competency, (3) managing DS in a hospital setting, and (4) DS adverse events. Participants were surveyed, at baseline and after training, about DS knowledge, confidence, communication, and documentation practices. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 61 (64%) recruited clinicians completed all four patient cases and post-tests. Most (82%) were women and 59% were physicians. The mean DS knowledge test score increased after the curriculum (p < 0.0001), and the clinician confidence score also increased (p < 0.0001). Most (82%) participants reported that curriculum changed their use of evidence-based resources (p = 0.01). There was a change in the indications for symptom management (p = 0.05) and gastrointestinal/digestive health issues (p = 0.03). There were statistically significant increases in the frequency of asking patients about DS use during discharge (p = 0.01), and 82% responded that the curriculum changed their DS documentation. CONCLUSION: An online curriculum is an effective tool for presenting DS education to clinicians with the goal of improving clinicians' knowledge, confidence, and documentation practices about DS.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=26270001&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605355/
dc.subjectAlternative and Complementary Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Communication
dc.subjectHealth Information Technology
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectIntegrative Medicine
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.titleOnline Education for Improving Communication and Documentation of Dietary Supplements Among Health Professionals Practicing in a Hospital Setting
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)
dc.source.volume21
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cipc/54
dc.identifier.contextkey13859579
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Little is known about the feasibility of online education in improving communication and documentation of dietary supplements (DS) among clinicians.</p> <p>METHODS: This prospective educational study included clinicians at an urban teaching hospital. The curriculum included video streams, didactics, and interactive case presentations to discuss (1) DS safety and effectiveness, (2) cultural competency, (3) managing DS in a hospital setting, and (4) DS adverse events. Participants were surveyed, at baseline and after training, about DS knowledge, confidence, communication, and documentation practices.</p> <p>RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 61 (64%) recruited clinicians completed all four patient cases and post-tests. Most (82%) were women and 59% were physicians. The mean DS knowledge test score increased after the curriculum (p < 0.0001), and the clinician confidence score also increased (p < 0.0001). Most (82%) participants reported that curriculum changed their use of evidence-based resources (p = 0.01). There was a change in the indications for symptom management (p = 0.05) and gastrointestinal/digestive health issues (p = 0.03). There were statistically significant increases in the frequency of asking patients about DS use during discharge (p = 0.01), and 82% responded that the curriculum changed their DS documentation.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: An online curriculum is an effective tool for presenting DS education to clinicians with the goal of improving clinicians' knowledge, confidence, and documentation practices about DS.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcipc/54
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Integrated Primary Care
dc.source.pages638-44


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record