Case files key to comprehensive medical board reviews
| dc.contributor.author | Simpson, Jody | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:08:07.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T15:43:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T15:43:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-08-23 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-10-11 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.13028/keyc-t050 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/26986 | |
| dc.description | <p>Blog post to Commonwealth Medicine's website - <a href="https://commed.umassmed.edu/blog/2018/08/23/case-files-key-comprehensive-medical-board-reviews" target="_blank">View blog post online</a></p> | |
| dc.description.abstract | There are many obstacles public retirement systems must overcome to ensure clinically sound medical board recommendations. Complex medical records that describe various conditions and ailmentsmust be compiled and analyzed to make accurate recommendations. There are key elements to inform a successful medical board review, and chief among them is compiling robust, well-documented case files. If you begin the process with incomplete documentation, you run the risk of getting a partial clinical picture of the member. Not having a full clinical picture could make it difficult to achieve a fully-informed decision. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.rights | © 2018 University of Massachusetts Medical School | |
| dc.subject | public retirement systems | |
| dc.subject | medical board reviews | |
| dc.subject | medical records | |
| dc.subject | Health Economics | |
| dc.subject | Health Law and Policy | |
| dc.subject | Health Policy | |
| dc.subject | Health Services Administration | |
| dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
| dc.title | Case files key to comprehensive medical board reviews | |
| dc.type | Blog Post | |
| dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1210&context=commed_pubs&unstamped=1 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/commed_pubs/214 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 13063701 | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2022-08-23T15:43:00Z | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>There are many obstacles public retirement systems must overcome to ensure clinically sound medical board recommendations. Complex medical records that describe various conditions and ailmentsmust be compiled and analyzed to make accurate recommendations. There are key elements to inform a successful medical board review, and chief among them is compiling robust, well-documented case files. If you begin the process with incomplete documentation, you run the risk of getting a partial clinical picture of the member. Not having a full clinical picture could make it difficult to achieve a fully-informed decision.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | commed_pubs/214 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Commonwealth Medicine, Disability Evaluation Services |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Policy Brief: Addressing Social Determinants of Health through Community Health Workers: A Call to ActionThis technical report was compiled by the Hispanic Health Council in partnership with Southwestern AHEC and a panel of Community Health Worker Policy Research Experts which included our Katharine London from the Center for Health Law and Economics. The report offers a number of policy recommendations for community health workers for communities that might benefit from community-based services. The report offers recommendations on; payment of community health workers; community health worker caseloads; community health worker recruitment; community health worker training; reflective and trauma-informed mentoring and supportive supervision of community health workers; integration of community health workers into care teams; documenting the effect of community heal worker services on social determination of health. The Hispanic Health Council believes a service design that effectively supports community health workers would incorporate the seven areas of policy recommendation included in this report.
-
A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family MembersDuring the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.
-
Making the Case for Sustainable Funding for Community Health Worker Services: Talking to Payers and ProvidersIn this presentation, Katharine London of the Center for Health Law and Economics makes her case for offering sustainable funding for community health worker services. Research has shown community health workers can have a distinct impact on health systems, helping them improve population health and contain costs, while also promoting health equity and community engagement. This presentation was designed to assist CHWs and other advocates in engaging with policymakers and payers to support CHW sustainability and develop a financial plan for their CHW work. It was presented as part of a CHW Sustainability event held at the Families USA’s annual conference, Health Action 2018: Staying Strong for America’s Families, in Washington, DC. See Katharine London's blog post on payment delivery methods for community health workers here.
