Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJerbi, Zouheir
dc.contributor.authorHouman, Mohamed H.
dc.contributor.authorGhedira, Habib
dc.contributor.authorKamoun, Samir
dc.contributor.authorSalah, Afif Ben
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-01
dc.date.submitted2014-12-12
dc.identifier.citationTunis Med. 2011 Oct;89(10):784-9.
dc.identifier.issn0041-4131 (Linking)
dc.identifier.pmid22076903
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27116
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There are not information about the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its prophylaxis in Tunisia. AIM: To report the Tunisian results of a multinational crosssectional study, designed to assess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting and to determine the proportion of at risk patients who receive effective prophylaxis. METHODS: All hospital inpatients aged 40 years or over admitted to a medical ward or these aged 18 years or over admitted to surgical ward, in 5 Tunisian hospitals were assessed for risk of VTE on the basis of hospital chart review. The 2004 American College of chest physicians (ACCP) evidence based consensus guidelines were used to assess VTE risk and to determine whether patients were received recommended prophylaxis. RESULTS: 885 were enrolled, 212 (24%) were surgical and 673 (76%) were medical. 408 (44, 9%) judged to be at risk, 95 (44, 8%) are surgical and 313 (46, 5%) are medical. LWMH are the most used. Mechanical prophylaxis was never used. CONCLUSION: The percentage of at risk patient in Tunisia is comparable to these of other countries. The majority of at risk patient are medical. The prophylaxis was under used. Hospital strategies to assess patient VTE risk and implementation of prophylaxis protocols are needed.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=22076903&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.latunisiemedicale.com/article-medicale-tunisie.php?article=1817&Codelang=en
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subject*Hospitalization
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectTunisia
dc.subjectVenous Thromboembolism
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectClinical Epidemiology
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleVenous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting-results of the Endorse study in Tunisia
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleLa Tunisie medicale
dc.source.volume89
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_endorse/17
dc.identifier.contextkey6456545
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: There are not information about the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its prophylaxis in Tunisia. AIM: To report the Tunisian results of a multinational crosssectional study, designed to assess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting and to determine the proportion of at risk patients who receive effective prophylaxis.</p> <p>METHODS: All hospital inpatients aged 40 years or over admitted to a medical ward or these aged 18 years or over admitted to surgical ward, in 5 Tunisian hospitals were assessed for risk of VTE on the basis of hospital chart review. The 2004 American College of chest physicians (ACCP) evidence based consensus guidelines were used to assess VTE risk and to determine whether patients were received recommended prophylaxis.</p> <p>RESULTS: 885 were enrolled, 212 (24%) were surgical and 673 (76%) were medical. 408 (44, 9%) judged to be at risk, 95 (44, 8%) are surgical and 313 (46, 5%) are medical. LWMH are the most used. Mechanical prophylaxis was never used.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: The percentage of at risk patient in Tunisia is comparable to these of other countries. The majority of at risk patient are medical. The prophylaxis was under used. Hospital strategies to assess patient VTE risk and implementation of prophylaxis protocols are needed.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcor_endorse/17
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Outcomes Research
dc.source.pages784-9


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record