Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFox, Keith A. A.
dc.contributor.authorFitzGerald, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorPuymirat, Etienne
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Wei
dc.contributor.authorCarruthers, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Tabassome
dc.contributor.authorCoste, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorMonsegu, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorSteg, Phillippe Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorDanchin, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Frederick A. Jr.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:43:51Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:43:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-21
dc.date.submitted2014-02-27
dc.identifier.citationFox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, Huang W, Carruthers K, Simon T, Coste P, Monsegu J, Gabriel Steg P, Danchin N, Anderson F. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 21;4(2):e004425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425" target="_blank">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425
dc.identifier.pmid24561498
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27186
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Risk scores are recommended in guidelines to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Internationally, such scores are not systematically used because they are not easy to apply and some risk indicators are not available at first presentation. We aimed to derive and externally validate a more accurate version of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score for predicting the risk of death or death/myocardial infarction (MI) both acutely and over the longer term. The risk score was designed to be suitable for acute and emergency clinical settings and usable in electronic devices. DESIGN AND SETTING: The GRACE risk score (2.0) was derived in 32 037 patients from the GRACE registry (14 countries, 94 hospitals) and validated externally in the French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI (FAST-MI) 2005. PARTICIPANTS: Patients presenting with ST-elevation and non-ST elevation ACS and with long-term outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: The GRACE Score (2.0) predicts the risk of short-term and long-term mortality, and death/MI, overall and in hospital survivors. RESULTS: For key independent risk predictors of death (1 year), non-linear associations (vs linear) were found for age (p CONCLUSIONS: The updated GRACE risk score has better discrimination and is easier to use than the previous score based on linear associations. GRACE Risk (2.0) performed equally well acutely and over the longer term and can be used in a variety of clinical settings to aid management decisions.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=24561498&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
dc.subjectAcute coronary syndromes
dc.subjectMyocardical infarction
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectRisk management
dc.subjectRisk scores
dc.subjectMedical management
dc.subjectEmergency medicine
dc.subjectCardiology
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleShould patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ Open
dc.source.volume4
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&amp;context=cor_grace&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/115
dc.identifier.contextkey5230869
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:43:51Z
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVES: Risk scores are recommended in guidelines to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Internationally, such scores are not systematically used because they are not easy to apply and some risk indicators are not available at first presentation. We aimed to derive and externally validate a more accurate version of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score for predicting the risk of death or death/myocardial infarction (MI) both acutely and over the longer term. The risk score was designed to be suitable for acute and emergency clinical settings and usable in electronic devices.</p> <p>DESIGN AND SETTING: The GRACE risk score (2.0) was derived in 32 037 patients from the GRACE registry (14 countries, 94 hospitals) and validated externally in the French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI (FAST-MI) 2005.</p> <p>PARTICIPANTS: Patients presenting with ST-elevation and non-ST elevation ACS and with long-term outcomes.</p> <p>OUTCOME MEASURES: The GRACE Score (2.0) predicts the risk of short-term and long-term mortality, and death/MI, overall and in hospital survivors.</p> <p>RESULTS: For key independent risk predictors of death (1 year), non-linear associations (vs linear) were found for age (p</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The updated GRACE risk score has better discrimination and is easier to use than the previous score based on linear associations. GRACE Risk (2.0) performed equally well acutely and over the longer term and can be used in a variety of clinical settings to aid management decisions.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcor_grace/115
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Outcomes Research
dc.source.pagese004425


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
BMJ_Open_2014_Fox_.pdf
Size:
1.426Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record