Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Authors
Dey, S.Flather, Marcus D.
Devlin, G.
Brieger, David
Gurfinkel, Enrique P.
Steg, Phillippe Gabriel
Fitzgerald, Gordon
Jackson, Elizabeth A.
Eagle, Kim A.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Center for Outcomes ResearchDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2009-01-09Keywords
Acute Coronary SyndromeAdrenergic beta-Antagonists
Adult
Aged
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Coronary Angiography
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Male
Middle Aged
Registries
Sex Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether sex differences exist in the angiographic severity, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS: The study comprised 7638 women and 19 117 men with ACS who underwent coronary angiography and were included in GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) from 1999-2006. Normal vessels/mild disease was defined as <50% stenosis in all epicardial vessels; advanced disease was defined as >or=one vessel with >or=50% stenosis. RESULTS: Women were older than men and had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors. Men and women presented equally with chest pain; however, jaw pain and nausea were more frequent among women. Women were more likely to have normal/mild disease (12% vs 6%, p<0.001) and less likely to have left-main and three-vessel disease (27% vs 32%, p<0.001) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (65% vs 68%, p<0.001). Women and men with normal and mild disease were treated less aggressively than those with advanced disease. Women with advanced disease had a higher risk of death (4% vs 3%, p<0.01). After adjustment for age and extent of disease, women were more likely to have adverse outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, stroke and rehospitalisation) at six months compared to men (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.34); however, sex differences in mortality were no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Women with ACS were more likely to have cardiovascular disease risk factors and atypical symptoms such as nausea compared with men, but were more likely to have normal/mild angiographic coronary artery disease. Further study regarding sex differences related to disease severity is warranted.Source
Heart. 2009 Jan;95(1):20-6. Epub 2008 May 7. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1136/hrt.2007.138537Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27200PubMed ID
18463200Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/hrt.2007.138537